Re: [Mingw-w64-public] current way to printf a size_type and size_t?

2014-03-15 Thread Ray Donnelly
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:59 PM, LRN wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 16.03.2014 2:26, Jim Michaels wrote: >> my understanding is gcc uses size_t for both. I think there used ot >> be a %I or something like that for size_type, but not sure what it >> is now, since I

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] current way to printf a size_type and size_t?

2014-03-15 Thread JonY
On 3/16/2014 07:59, LRN wrote: > On 16.03.2014 2:26, Jim Michaels wrote: >> my understanding is gcc uses size_t for both. I think there used ot >> be a %I or something like that for size_type, but not sure what it >> is now, since I have forgotten, and %I by itself seems to require a >> number of b

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] current way to printf a size_type and size_t?

2014-03-15 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16.03.2014 2:26, Jim Michaels wrote: > my understanding is gcc uses size_t for both. I think there used ot > be a %I or something like that for size_type, but not sure what it > is now, since I have forgotten, and %I by itself seems to require a > n

[Mingw-w64-public] current way to printf a size_type and size_t?

2014-03-15 Thread Jim Michaels
my understanding is gcc uses size_t for both. I think there used ot be a %I or something like that for size_type, but not sure what it is now, since I have forgotten, and %I by itself seems to require a number of bits like %I64u. my memory is fuzzy. thanks.   - Jim Michaels jmich...