Re: [Mingw-w64-public] win7 auto-killing console mode programs

2013-11-15 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
Op 16-nov.-2013 04:44 schreef "Jim Michaels" : > > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1e4e6548-2371-41c0-842d-70a2ed4a495f/win7-is-killing-my-heavy-process-what-to-do?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues > see my post above. I don't know what's going on but windows 7 is killing my long-

[Mingw-w64-public] win7 auto-killing console mode programs

2013-11-15 Thread Jim Michaels
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1e4e6548-2371-41c0-842d-70a2ed4a495f/win7-is-killing-my-heavy-process-what-to-do?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues see my post above. I don't know what's going on but windows 7 is killing my long-running console mode programs.it doesn't kill the c

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] changing a DLLs load-time dynamic link dependency

2013-11-15 Thread Jon
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2013/11/15 Jon : > > After skimming LRN's ntldd https://github.com/LRN/ntldd tool, reading > tinype > > again http://www.phreedom.org/research/tinype/ and updating my upx > > http://upx.sourceforge.net/ I'm curious if binary tweaks to mingw buil

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] C++11 threading with non-posix versions

2013-11-15 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2013/11/15 Victor Bombi > Hello, > > Why cant we have C++11 threading with non-posix versions? > Because libstdc++ implements , and on top of GCC's internal thread API, for which only the posix threads "backend" is implemented fully. Ruben > > best > victor > > > >

[Mingw-w64-public] C++11 threading with non-posix versions

2013-11-15 Thread Victor Bombi
Hello, Why cant we have C++11 threading with non-posix versions? best victor -- DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Acce

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented

2013-11-15 Thread Victor Bombi
thanks for answering. Nothing is trivial for me using pthreads. I just need that to compile code made by others that I would not like to change. - Original Message - From: "Kai Tietz" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 5:54 PM Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pthread_attr_setschedpoli

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented

2013-11-15 Thread Victor Bombi
another question is: Why cant we have C++11 threading with non-posix versions? > Hello, > > versions posix-sjlj for 32 bits (I need C++11 threading) have > pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented > I think that there are some versions of pthread that implement that > feature. > Is there any r

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented

2013-11-15 Thread Kai Tietz
2013/11/15 Victor Bombi : > Hello, > > versions posix-sjlj for 32 bits (I need C++11 threading) have > pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented > I think that there are some versions of pthread that implement that feature. > Is there any reason for that? Is this going to change in the future? >

[Mingw-w64-public] pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented

2013-11-15 Thread Victor Bombi
Hello, versions posix-sjlj for 32 bits (I need C++11 threading) have pthread_attr_setschedpolicy not implemented I think that there are some versions of pthread that implement that feature. Is there any reason for that? Is this going to change in the future? best regards victor

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] changing a DLLs load-time dynamic link dependency

2013-11-15 Thread Kai Tietz
2013/11/15 Jon : > After skimming LRN's ntldd https://github.com/LRN/ntldd tool, reading tinype > again http://www.phreedom.org/research/tinype/ and updating my upx > http://upx.sourceforge.net/ I'm curious if binary tweaks to mingw built DLLs > (e.g. - libffi, libxml2, etc) could easily solve one