Greetings Edscott Wilson,
In Unix, "\r\n" for a newline, versus '\n' in Windows?
Maybe a unix2dos the file would put everything in
perspective?
Edscott Wilson wrote:
> I've been banging my head against the monitor for the past
nine hours and
> narrowed a problem down to the following.
> I've f
Edscott Wilson писал 2013-10-16 03:07:
> I've been banging my head against the monitor for the past nine hours and
> narrowed a problem down to the following.
> I've found that for certain data, the read() function will return a short
> byte count.
>
> Take the following test file: http://
On 10/16/13, Edscott Wilson wrote:
> I've been banging my head against the monitor for the past nine hours and
> narrowed a problem down to the following.
> I've found that for certain data, the read() function will return a short
> byte count.
>
> Take the following test file: http://xffm.org/te
I've been banging my head against the monitor for the past nine hours and
narrowed a problem down to the following.
I've found that for certain data, the read() function will return a short
byte count.
Take the following test file: http://xffm.org/test.dbh and compile and
execute the following pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.10.2013 16:34, LRN wrote:
> Testcase is attached. Some invocations of stpcpy work, some don't.
>
expand_builtin_stpcpy() from gcc/builtins.c sheds some light on this
(when return value is ignored, stpcpy() is replaced with strcpy()).
After readi
2013/10/15 Jon
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/15 LRN
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 15.10.2013 14:06, Incongruous wrote:
>>> > I would like to test for MinGW64 to include or exclude some code;
>>> something lik
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2013/10/15 LRN
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 15.10.2013 14:06, Incongruous wrote:
>> > I would like to test for MinGW64 to include or exclude some code;
>> something like:
>> > #ifdef MinGW64
>> > doThis();
Well, I don't believe in Voodoo here. My bets would go for builtin
function vs. C-library function. Is there actually such a function in
msvcrt?
Am 15.10.2013 14:35 schrieb "LRN" :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Testcase is attached. Some invocations of stpcpy work, some d
2013/10/15 LRN
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Testcase is attached. Some invocations of stpcpy work, some don't.
>
I assume you meant something including string.h, like this:
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/1b967a7cb671a204
This also shows the supposed output you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Testcase is attached. Some invocations of stpcpy work, some don't.
- --
O< ascii ribbon - stop html email! - www.asciiribbon.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXTZoAAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwN9kIAMWBwG/OIv/v3lSpK
2013/10/15 LRN
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 15.10.2013 14:06, Incongruous wrote:
> > I would like to test for MinGW64 to include or exclude some code;
> something like:
> > #ifdef MinGW64
> > doThis();
> > #endif
> > #ifdef __MSV__
> > doSomthingElse
> > #endif
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.10.2013 14:06, Incongruous wrote:
> I would like to test for MinGW64 to include or exclude some code; something
> like:
> #ifdef MinGW64
> doThis();
> #endif
> #ifdef __MSV__
> doSomthingElse
> #endif
>
> is this possible?
>
#ifdef __MINGW64_V
I would like to test for MinGW64 to include or exclude some code; something
like:
#ifdef MinGW64
doThis();
#endif
#ifdef __MSV__
doSomthingElse
#endif
is this possible?
tia
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free
On 10/15/2013 10:30, niXman wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Report:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/349/
>
> Patch in attachment.
> Ok to apply?
>
Please contact Jacek, since there is a corresponding devicetopology.idl.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
