18.09.2013, в 12:40, Rainer Emrich написал(а):
I'm trying to run testsuite myself too. All tests fail because fail fix
includes. Something wrong with reading from stdin.
My log is here: http://pastebin.com/LKdiuPUG
fixincl is native Windows program but other - is MSYS programs and something
w
> >
> > Good luck with spelunking the awesomeness that makes up your MinGW-w64
> > toolchain.
> >
>
> Do go on.
>
>
Your turn. I'm waiting to learn some cool new build tool tricks from you or
others :)
--
October Webinars:
Heh heh, Incongruous it's your luck day.
JonY, gave you all the answers and you didn't even have to dig. Oh well,
the Socratic method is overrated and irritating after about two questions ;)
--
October Webinars: Code for P
On 10/5/2013 05:46, Jon wrote:
>
> In addition to LRN's awesome feedback, here are a few other comments...
>
> 1) Hold off spelunking autotools (aka AutoHell) until you're comfortable
> with gcc/g++, ld, binutils, and make. Autotools is the Quasimodo of
> software tools. Horrific to look at but i
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:14 AM, LRN wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04.10.2013 18:15, Incongruous wrote:
> > Which of these compilers should I use if I want to compile in 64bit?
> >
> > /bin/g++.exe
> > /bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe
> >
> >
> > Is this correct?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04.10.2013 18:15, Incongruous wrote:
> Which of these compilers should I use if I want to compile in 64bit?
>
> /bin/g++.exe
> /bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe
>
>
> Is this correct?
>
> if(OS_64_BIT){
>/bin/g++.exe
> }
> else{
>/bin/x86_
Which of these compilers should I use if I want to compile in 64bit?
/bin/g++.exe
/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe
Is this correct?
if(OS_64_BIT){
/bin/g++.exe
}
else{
/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe
}
Thanks
From: Jon
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:27 PM
To: mingw-w64-public
Subj
Op 3-okt.-2013 23:10 schreef "JonY" :
>
> On 10/4/2013 02:32, Roger Pack wrote:
> > As a note, this page:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/
> >
> > still says "looking for the latest version? download 2.0.8" which
> > maybe isn't expected?
> > Cheers, and thank you for a great pr
