Re: [Mingw-w64-public] tcl fails to build due to conflicting implementation of EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION structure

2013-09-16 Thread Kai Tietz
2013/9/16 Jacek Caban : > On 09/16/13 22:08, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On 9/16/13, Jacek Caban wrote: >>> On 09/16/13 21:26, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Any ideas on whether this should be fixed in mingw-w64? >>> AFAICS it's not present in PSDK. It contains only >>> EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD, n

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] tcl fails to build due to conflicting implementation of EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION structure

2013-09-16 Thread Jacek Caban
On 09/16/13 21:26, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Any ideas on whether this should be fixed in mingw-w64? AFAICS it's not present in PSDK. It contains only EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD, no EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION. It was added by Kai in patch: http://repo.or.cz/w/mingw-w64/jacek.git/commitdiff/a0b651

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] tcl fails to build due to conflicting implementation of EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION structure

2013-09-16 Thread Jacek Caban
On 09/16/13 22:08, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 9/16/13, Jacek Caban wrote: >> On 09/16/13 21:26, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >>> Any ideas on whether this should be fixed in mingw-w64? >> AFAICS it's not present in PSDK. It contains only >> EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD, no EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION. It wa

[Mingw-w64-public] tcl fails to build due to conflicting implementation of EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION structure

2013-09-16 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Hey all, The test mass rebuild against r6284 has shown that tcl currently still fails to build: i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -I"../../generic" -DTCL_TOMMATH -DMP_PREC=4 -I"../../libtommath"

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] tcl fails to build due to conflicting implementation of EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION structure

2013-09-16 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 9/16/13, Jacek Caban wrote: > On 09/16/13 21:26, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >> Any ideas on whether this should be fixed in mingw-w64? > > AFAICS it's not present in PSDK. It contains only > EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD, no EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION. It was added > by Kai in patch: > http://repo.o

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread Jacek Caban
On 09/14/13 08:03, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2013/9/14 JonY : >> On 9/14/2013 02:45, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> On 9/13/13, Kai Tietz wrote: Well, I consider, if we might want to define _FORCENAMELESSUNION in _mingw.h for 3.0, and remove it on our trunk. By this we reduce fallout right now, pr

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread JonY
On 9/16/2013 21:09, Suresh Govindachar wrote: > > But I am puzzled by the following in the last quoted para above: "trunk > is where all development work will take place, unless the code in > question is known to be broken work-in-progress code" -- if the trunk is > where all the development wo

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread Suresh Govindachar
On 9/16/2013 4:38 AM, JonY wrote: > On 9/16/2013 19:17, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> IMO, trunk is a stable branch that all other branches evolve from. >> You create a working branch named for the next release that all work >> is done to and is unstable up until the call for testing. After the >> call fo

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread JonY
On 9/16/2013 19:17, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > IMO, trunk is a stable branch that all other branches evolve from. > You create a working branch named for the next release that all work > is done to and is unstable up until the call for testing. After the > call for testing only bug fixes for that rel

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/14 Jon: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ruben Van Boxem >>> I think you guys are missing the main problem: the fact that for the last >>> half year, trunk was necessary to build the latest GCC version. I'm >>> confident the whole trunk sta

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-16 Thread niXman
2013/9/14 Jon: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ruben Van Boxem >> I think you guys are missing the main problem: the fact that for the last >> half year, trunk was necessary to build the latest GCC version. I'm >> confident the whole trunk stability question will descend into only murmurs >> if