Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] intrsinsic _lrotl

2013-09-14 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 9/14/13, dw wrote: > >> I asked somebody with an installed VS and indeed >> winnt.h header includes intrin.h header by their SDK. So your fix is >> no fix at all. It just removed a compatibility we had in the past, >> and now doesn't exist anymore. > > intrin.h is not included in the Windows

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] intrsinsic _lrotl

2013-09-14 Thread dw
I asked somebody with an installed VS and indeed winnt.h header includes intrin.h header by their SDK. So your fix is no fix at all. It just removed a compatibility we had in the past, and now doesn't exist anymore. intrin.h is not included in the Windows 7 sdk version (either v7.0 or v7.1)

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread JonY
On 9/14/2013 21:46, Incongruous wrote: > JonY, just to let you know that your emails come as an attachment in not in > the body of the email. > Sorry :) Use a client that supports PGP/MIME, something other than Outlook express. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Jon
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > Op 14-sep.-2013 13:50 schreef "Erik van Pienbroek" > het volgende: > > > > > JonY schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 19:24 [+0800]: > > > Daily automated tarballs already done by buildbot. Probably need to add > > > something like svnversion to g

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Incongruous
JonY, just to let you know that your emails come as an attachment in not in the body of the email. Sorry :) -Original Message- From: JonY Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:39 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for t

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
Op 14-sep.-2013 13:50 schreef "Erik van Pienbroek" het volgende: > > JonY schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 19:24 [+0800]: > > Daily automated tarballs already done by buildbot. Probably need to add > > something like svnversion to generate release revision info in a special > > header. > > I personally

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread JonY
On 9/14/2013 19:49, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > JonY schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 19:24 [+0800]: >> Daily automated tarballs already done by buildbot. Probably need to add >> something like svnversion to generate release revision info in a special >> header. > > I personally think daily releases ar

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
JonY schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 19:24 [+0800]: > Daily automated tarballs already done by buildbot. Probably need to add > something like svnversion to generate release revision info in a special > header. I personally think daily releases are a bit too much bleeding edge. Of course they're usefu

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 9/14/13, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Adrien Nader schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 08:13 [+0200]: >> I've already mentioned that; I really prefer to have tarballs and >> releases, even if they are "preview" or "alpha". >> Currently everyone uses a different CRT and it's almost impossible to >> remem

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread JonY
On 9/14/2013 19:11, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Adrien Nader schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 08:13 [+0200]: >> I've already mentioned that; I really prefer to have tarballs and >> releases, even if they are "preview" or "alpha". >> Currently everyone uses a different CRT and it's almost impossible to >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Adrien Nader schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 08:13 [+0200]: > I've already mentioned that; I really prefer to have tarballs and > releases, even if they are "preview" or "alpha". > Currently everyone uses a different CRT and it's almost impossible to > remember the differences between them. > > PS: I

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-14 Thread JonY
On 9/14/2013 14:03, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2013/9/14 JonY : >> On 9/14/2013 02:45, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> On 9/13/13, Kai Tietz wrote: Well, I consider, if we might want to define _FORCENAMELESSUNION in _mingw.h for 3.0, and remove it on our trunk. By this we reduce fallout right now, p

[Mingw-w64-public] libmingw32 error

2013-09-14 Thread 袁磊
Hi: i was used the mingw64 for ffmpeg static library but when i used the static library in vs2008 it is error as : libmingw32.a(lib64_libmingw32_a-pesect.o) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __image_base__, my library link order is #pragma comment(lib, "libgcc.a") #pragma comment(lib,