On 9/7/2013 08:44, dw wrote:
>
> However, if that's not acceptable, perhaps there is an alternative. If
> the requirement I'm violating here is simply that these specific
> functions must be able to support not being inlined, then I believe
> simply changing them from "FORCEINLINE" to "inline" wou
It's a really delayed reply, dw asked me to join the conversation.
Hey Jacek, thanks for you thoughts on this. However, it doesn't seem to
have brought us to a conclusion. I've been trying to avoid "nagging"
(something I am prone to do), especially since I've seen how busy Kai
has been with
Hi Incongruous!
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Incongruous wrote:
> OKay?
>
> Code Snip
>
> #include //share_ptr
> std::shared_ptr apx; //<--Does not work
>
> Error
>
> g++-c -g -I/c/abc -I/c/abc/gui/msg/ -MMD -MP -MF
std::shared_ptr is new to c++11, so you proba
OKay?
Code Snip
#include //share_ptr
std::shared_ptr apx; //<--Does not work
Error
g++-c -g -I/c/abc -I/c/abc/gui/msg/ -MMD -MP -MF
build/Debug/MinGW64-Windows/_ext/348948719/MyClass.o.d -o
build/Debug/MinGW64-Windows/_ext/348948719/MyClass.o
/C/abc/MyClass/MyCl
Thanks Ruben, not only do I appreciate your advice about the proper way of
posting questions, but I will also follow your advice about trying
‘stackoverflow’.
Have a good one!
From: Ruben Van Boxem
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:34 PM
To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re
Yes, I am using g++.
__cplusplus is defined in stddef and I have specifically #include(ed) that file.
I hope that this new info will clear things.
I know that you kids have a better understanding of C++ than me, so I know that
the answer to this issue lies in this mailing list.
Thanks for the hel
"Incongruous"
writes:
> Thanks for your help.
> Perhaps it is the way I am using it
> GNU version is 4.8.1
>
> #include
>
> tr1::shared_ptr uex;
>
> Is this correct?
With C++11 shared_ptr is in the std namespace. Try
#include
std::shared_ptr uex;
Also, please provide complete information w
Op 6-sep.-2013 21:51 schreef "Incongruous" het
volgende:
>
> Yes, I am using g++.
> __cplusplus is defined in stddef and I have specifically #include(ed)
that file.
> I hope that this new info will clear things.
> I know that you kids have a better understanding of C++ than me, so I
know that the
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Erik van Pienbroek
wrote:
> JonY schreef op vr 06-09-2013 om 18:43 [+0800]:
>> We will be releasing v3 from trunk soon. Testers, please check with the
>> latest trunk version if any of the changes break your applications!
>
> Hi Jon and other mingw-w64 devs,
>
> It
Thanks kids for the prompt response, it was a welcoming surprise when I cam
in this morning.
You are absolutely right, I am using MinGW-64's g++ compiler.
And about the second observation, the #if* are with in the main(). The
checking is done this way so to let some of the program run, you know,
JonY schreef op vr 06-09-2013 om 18:43 [+0800]:
> We will be releasing v3 from trunk soon. Testers, please check with the
> latest trunk version if any of the changes break your applications!
Hi Jon and other mingw-w64 devs,
It's great to hear that v3 will be released any day now!
Before I kick
2013/9/6 JonY:
> Hello all,
>
> We will be releasing v3 from trunk soon. Testers, please check with the
> latest trunk version if any of the changes break your applications!
>
> Some of the new changes since v2 include:
>
> * Improved floating point math performance
> * Improved MSVC compiler intri
Hello all,
We will be releasing v3 from trunk soon. Testers, please check with the
latest trunk version if any of the changes break your applications!
Some of the new changes since v2 include:
* Improved floating point math performance
* Improved MSVC compiler intrinsics performance
* C99 printf
13 matches
Mail list logo
