Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] intrinsics

2013-08-08 Thread dw
So, no response here, other than a few (brief) comments on irc. It's hard to know how to advocate for a patch when I'm not sure what the objections are. But it seems likely that that biggest areas of concern aren't the changes to the inline asm, but the files I'm deleting from \intrinsc\. W

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] linking issue with postgresql and curl

2013-08-08 Thread Kai Tietz
Hmm, not necessarily a gcc bug. It might be simply that the dll itself has dependencies to other dll-files. Try to check by dependency-walker tool, or via the objdump tool, what other DLL-files might be referenced. Most likely it is an issue about libgcc.dll file. Regards, Kai -

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] linking issue with postgresql and curl

2013-08-08 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/06/2013 05:12 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I'm attempting to build a project that uses both PostgreSQL (libpq.dll) and > CuRL > (libcurl.dll), but I have run into a issue when both are linked into the same > executable. I have a simple test case that I am attaching that demonstrates > t

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Semi-OT -- libcurl and mingw-w6 / c++

2013-08-08 Thread K. Frank
Hello niXman! On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM, niXman wrote: > 2013/8/7 K. Frank > >> Do I anticipate any issues using libcurl with mingw-w64? If so, what >> should I look out for and how might I deal with it? > > No, libcurl is easy to build with mingw-w64. Thanks for the confirmation. >> Seco

[Mingw-w64-public] Usability improvement: add debug breaks to abort() calls

2013-08-08 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 abort() is a msvcr(t) function, and it does not throw an exception, just prints a message and terminates your program. Well, actually, it does call SIGABRT handler before terminating. But that's in-program, and isn't known to the debugger. And most lib

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Omnipresent libgcc dependency

2013-08-08 Thread Kai Tietz
2013/8/8 LRN : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07.08.2013 22:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> On 08/07/2013 01:35 PM, LRN wrote: >>> What does "might" mean there? Like, you may get a dependency, or you may >>> not? It doesn't sound like you ALWAYS get a dependency. >>> Pre