Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Runtime for Cygwin

2013-06-11 Thread dw
Sorry. Looking back, you did try to describe some of the issues. However, this hasn't helped clear things up. The problems are still essentially what the email I just sent said: > The point is that LP64 target provides type size_t proper for its ABI. Yes it does. However, winnt.h still cause

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Runtime for Cygwin

2013-06-11 Thread dw
Please keep signature in platform-headers as they are in prototypes. I'm trying to understand exactly what the requirement is here. You've been doing this kind of work for a long time, so if you say there's a reason to do this I expect there is. As I look at your patch (or my second one), I

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-06-11 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi, It feels like I'm spamming a bit so I hope I'm not too annoying with this. I've put a new version online and I hope that besides a couple of minor changes (cleaning some code and updating links), it is ready to go live: http://notk.org/~adrien/mingw-w64-download/htdocs/download.php -- Ad

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Алексей Павлов
Cygwin and MSYS have significantly different goals (even if MSYS is entirely based on Cygwin). My understanding is that MSYS is the minimal shell required to run autotools and get sources from internet from different repositories. MSYS is about porting Unix programs to Windows without having a Pos

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Make dxva2api.h compilable without d3d9.h

2013-06-11 Thread Rafaël Carré
--- mingw-w64-headers/include/dxva2api.h | 10 +- mingw-w64-headers/include/dxva2api.idl | 8 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dxva2api.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dxva2api.h index 3ab4842..c75474e 100644 --- a/mingw-w6

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Jon
Corrina, My user-based perspectives embedded below for your consideration... > On Jun 8 01:56, Алексей Павлов wrote: > > 2013/6/7 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > A final note: I'm not opposing the fork. Under the GPL it's your > > > perfect right to do so, as long as you adhere to the license >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 16:52, LRN wrote: > > And why exactly is that a problem? The cross compiler is creating > > the exact same code as a native-like compile with the same version. > Cross-compiling is somewhat more tricky. Also do remember that MSYS1 is > rather old, cross-compiling was even trickier back t

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Kai Tietz
2013/6/11 Corinna Vinschen : > On Jun 11 16:59, LRN wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11.06.2013 16:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: >> >> I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, >> >> redhat, th

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 16:42, m...@morous.org wrote: > > On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: > >> I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, > >> redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has put into both Cygwin and > >> MSYS2. > >> > >> Cygwin and MSYS2 exist for different, mut

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 16:59, LRN wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11.06.2013 16:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: > >> I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, > >> redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread mity
> On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: >> I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, >> redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has put into both Cygwin and >> MSYS2. >> >> Cygwin and MSYS2 exist for different, mutually exclusive goals. Anything >> we > > I fail to

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.06.2013 16:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: >> I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, >> redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has put into both Cygwin and >> MSYS2. >> >> C

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.06.2013 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 11 15:43, LRN wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11.06.2013 15:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Hi Алексей, >>> >>> On Jun 8 01:56, Алексей Павлов wrote: 2013/6

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Ray Donnelly
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:25 PM, LRN wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11.06.2013 15:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: > > MSYS itself was badly fragmented by the msysgit > > project which uses an even earlier version of MSYS than the latest one > > which is also missing impor

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.06.2013 15:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: > MSYS itself was badly fragmented by the msysgit > project which uses an even earlier version of MSYS than the latest one > which is also missing important tools such as "install.exe" and something > has to be

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 12:58, Ray Donnelly wrote: > I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, > redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has put into both Cygwin and > MSYS2. > > Cygwin and MSYS2 exist for different, mutually exclusive goals. Anything we I fail to see that. M

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 15:43, LRN wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11.06.2013 15:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Алексей, > > > > On Jun 8 01:56, Алексей Павлов wrote: > >> 2013/6/7 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> A final note: I'm not opposing the fork. Under the GPL it's y

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Ray Donnelly
I for one am hugely appreciative of all the hard work that Corinna, Kai, redhat, the mingw-w64 team and also Alexey has put into both Cygwin and MSYS2. Cygwin and MSYS2 exist for different, mutually exclusive goals. Anything we can reasonably do on MSYS2 (credits, thanks printed at each login, exp

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.06.2013 15:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Алексей, > > On Jun 8 01:56, Алексей Павлов wrote: >> 2013/6/7 Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> A final note: I'm not opposing the fork. Under the GPL it's your >>> perfect right to do so, as long as you

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 11 13:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Other than that I'm rather puzzled as to what MSYS2 is about, other than > to duplicate developer efforts and to split communities. Apart from > your perfect right to fork, you might nevertheless understand that I'm a > bit annoyed. Especially given the

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Алексей, On Jun 8 01:56, Алексей Павлов wrote: > 2013/6/7 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > A final note: I'm not opposing the fork. Under the GPL it's your > > perfect right to do so, as long as you adhere to the license > > requirements. But that doesn't mean I have to understand it. If the >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Алексей Павлов
2013/6/11 Corinna Vinschen > Hi Алексей, > > On Jun 10 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 8 12:49, Алексей Павлов wrote: > > > I recreate git repository on msys2.sf.net. > > > Now master branch point to MSYS2 source and when you go to code page on > > > sf.net you get page with MSYS2 sour

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Алексей, On Jun 10 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 8 12:49, Алексей Павлов wrote: > > I recreate git repository on msys2.sf.net. > > Now master branch point to MSYS2 source and when you go to code page on > > sf.net you get page with MSYS2 source. > > Thank you, that's much better. T

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t

2013-06-11 Thread JonY
On 6/11/2013 15:55, Koehne Kai wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jim Michaels [mailto:jmich...@yahoo.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:23 AM >> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t >> >> >> why would I want to use _

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2 GPL infringement (was Re: MSYS2)

2013-06-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 10 13:19, Алексей Павлов wrote: > Corinna, > I upload 3rdparty sources that I use in MSYS2 to > https://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/Sources/ Thank you. Corinna -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Window

[Mingw-w64-public] Missing definitions (reparse, sid)

2013-06-11 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SidTypeLabel is missing from winnt.h, please add it. Same goes for REPARSE_DATA_BUFFER. It is defined in both ntdef.h and ntifs.h, but only ntifs.h has REPARSE_DATA_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE. Patches are attached. - -- O< ascii ribbon - stop html email! -

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] add IID_IPersistFolder2 to shlguid.h

2013-06-11 Thread Kai Tietz
Thanks, I applied your patch at rev. 5886. Regards, Kai -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Mingw-w

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t

2013-06-11 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: Jim Michaels [mailto:jmich...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:23 AM > To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t > > > why would I want to use __mingw_printf? what exactly is it? why shouldn't

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t

2013-06-11 Thread Jim Michaels
why would I want to use __mingw_printf? what exactly is it? why shouldn't I just use printf like I think I should (end-user's prospective)? normally I would see that and assume it's some sort of internal compiler-use thing and avoid it and just stick with the the standard c library or c++ libra