Re: [Mingw-w64-public] use tdm-gcc to compile wx2.9.4, get i386:x86-64 architecture of input file incompatible error

2013-05-30 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
Op 31-mei-2013 05:58 schreef "zhangxinghai" het volgende: > > hello > I try to build 32-bit wx2.9.4 with tdm-gcc. > My os:windows xp (32bit) 5.1.2600 > I download tdm-gcc from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/tdm-gcc/files/TDM-GCC%20Installer/tdm64-gcc-4.7.1-3.exe/download > I cd wx\build\msw di

[Mingw-w64-public] use tdm-gcc to compile wx2.9.4, get i386:x86-64 architecture of input file incompatible error

2013-05-30 Thread zhangxinghai
hello I try to build 32-bit wx2.9.4 with tdm-gcc. My os:windows xp (32bit) 5.1.2600 I download tdm-gcc from http://sourceforge.net/projects/tdm-gcc/files/TDM-GCC%20Installer/tdm64-gcc-4.7.1-3.exe/download I cd wx\build\msw directory and invoke command ../../configure --build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mingw-w64-public Digest, Vol 68, Issue 29

2013-05-30 Thread Matheus Viana
Dear Ruben, you can overcome the problem with time.h doing this: After ./configure Open the file "Makefile", search for libf2c_la_CFLAGS = Put -DUSE_CLOCK after libf2c_la_CFLAGS = Now it looks like libf2c_la_CFLAGS = -DUSE_CLOCK -DSkip_f2c_Undefs Open igraph-0.6\src\f2c\uninit.c Goto Line 18

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-05-30 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2013/5/30 Adrien Nader > On Thu, May 30, 2013, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > > 2013/5/20 Adrien Nader > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've started working on a download page for the website. Currently the > > > download links point directly to the sourceforge file listing but > that's > > > not enough for

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
On Thu, May 30, 2013, Baruch Burstein wrote: > A "check/uncheck all" for each section would be useful. You're absolutely right, I'll add something to do this. -- Adrien Nader -- Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free trou

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
On Thu, May 30, 2013, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2013/5/20 Adrien Nader > > > Hi, > > > > I've started working on a download page for the website. Currently the > > download links point directly to the sourceforge file listing but that's > > not enough for the users to be able to chose the right(tm

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling igraph library

2013-05-30 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2013/5/30 Matheus Viana > Hi List. > > I'm trying to compile the igraph library using MinGW64, but it's not > working, though the 32 bits version compiles well in MinGW. > > In the source folder of igraph-0.6.5, the command > > ./configure --prefix=c:/mingw64 CC="x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc" > This i

[Mingw-w64-public] Compiling igraph library

2013-05-30 Thread Matheus Viana
Hi List. I'm trying to compile the igraph library using MinGW64, but it's not working, though the 32 bits version compiles well in MinGW. In the source folder of igraph-0.6.5, the command ./configure --prefix=c:/mingw64 CC="x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc" works fine, and this is the final result: Grap

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Fix bug in InterlockedOr

2013-05-30 Thread JonY
On 5/30/2013 06:45, dw wrote: > On 5/24/2013 8:43 PM, dw wrote: >> I looked at the hand-crafted and the built-in, and they both generate >> the same code. In the end, I went with the __sync_fetch_and_OP() >> built-in (attached). The comments above still apply. > > I'm going to wait for this patch

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-05-30 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2013/5/20 Adrien Nader > Hi, > > I've started working on a download page for the website. Currently the > download links point directly to the sourceforge file listing but that's > not enough for the users to be able to chose the right(tm) download. > > The page I've done is at: > http://notk.o

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Website] Work on a Download page

2013-05-30 Thread Baruch Burstein
A "check/uncheck all" for each section would be useful. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Adrien Nader schreef op ma 20-05-2013 om 11:17 [+0200]: > > As you can see on the page, besides the layout which isn't perfect, the > > toolchain descriptions are completely wrong