Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Success building 64 bit vim and gvim with perl [was: windres: unexpected version string length 68 != 32 + 8]

2013-02-21 Thread Suresh Govindachar
I used to build 32 bit Vim with perl support using mingw regularly, but stopped when I got 64 bit Windows 7 since my attempts at building a 64 bit version failed. Some hours ago, I got the latest vim sources using mercurial, and succeeded at building gvim and vim with support for 64 bit perl.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] TLS support fixes

2013-02-21 Thread David Nadlinger
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > Well, I am right now playing with your test-case. I think we should > approach it differently. How? > As by your code the TLS-region contains > always one element. "As by your code" - you mean as by the current tlssup.c implementation? As lo

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] TLS support fixes

2013-02-21 Thread David Nadlinger
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:47 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> please find two patches to fix/improve TLS support in mingw-w64-crt attached. > > Do you have commit rights? No. >> Also, please let me know if there is another preferr

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] TLS support fixes

2013-02-21 Thread Kai Tietz
Well, I am right now playing with your test-case. I think we should approach it differently. As by your code the TLS-region contains always one element. I just noticed that in pe.sc some weird position for .tls$AAA vs .tls$ZZZ is used. So indeed offsets look to me pretty much away from that w

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] TLS support fixes

2013-02-21 Thread NightStrike
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote: > Hi all, > > please find two patches to fix/improve TLS support in mingw-w64-crt attached. Do you have commit rights? > Also, please let me know if there is another preferred method to submit > patches. This works. We can also make you