Re: [Mingw-w64-public] msxml with mingw-w64 (for QuickFIX) (was: libxml2 with mingw-w64?)

2013-01-10 Thread Jon
> Just fix MSYS Autotooling for the whole thing and use libxml2! > > ;-) Indeed...it's a new year and your hard-working dev system has earned a much needed upgrade ;) Here's another way of quickly getting an msys + mingw-w64 environment. First, download and extract these MSYS files, say to `C

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] msxml with mingw-w64 (for QuickFIX) (was: libxml2 with mingw-w64?)

2013-01-10 Thread Ray Donnelly
Just fix MSYS Autotooling for the whole thing and use libxml2! ;-) On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM, pavel wrote: > Hi Frank, > > I think you should definitively use msxml2.h. I use msxml quite often in > my applications, but I have my own generated include file, which > contains the CLSIDs, IID

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] msxml with mingw-w64 (for QuickFIX) (was: libxml2 with mingw-w64?)

2013-01-10 Thread pavel
Hi Frank, I think you should definitively use msxml2.h. I use msxml quite often in my applications, but I have my own generated include file, which contains the CLSIDs, IIDs and interface definitions. If I look at msxml2.h, I can see that CLSID_DOMDocument is declared as extern and I have no idea

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] msxml with mingw-w64 (for QuickFIX) (was: libxml2 with mingw-w64?)

2013-01-10 Thread K. Frank
Hi Pavel! Thanks for your help. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:56 AM, pavel wrote: > Hi Frank, > > I went again through your posts and if I understand well, you are trying > to adapt some code written for MS VC++ to MinGW, is that correct? Yes, precisely. > In this case, you would probably need to

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] msxml with mingw-w64 (for QuickFIX) (was: libxml2 with mingw-w64?)

2013-01-10 Thread pavel
Hi Frank, I went again through your posts and if I understand well, you are trying to adapt some code written for MS VC++ to MinGW, is that correct? In this case, you would probably need to rewrite a small portion of the code, unless you will get for libxml2 in the end. I know nothing about Quic