On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>
>
> Really, I haven't seen any build system that I think is wonderful.
> autotools works for us, but it's not great. I've used a lot... even
> scons.
just for curiosity : what do you think of jam or one of its
derivatives (ftjam, bjam, etc...)
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> In the cmake world, to do the same thing, Dave has to be a lot more
>> knowledgeable of the internals of our project. He needs to know what
>> languages we use
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, deneme.true wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I know, wxWidgets uses bakefile(http://www.bakefile.org/index.html)
> system. Probably, bakefile is good for cross building of Makefiles for
> nmake,mingw-make,make etc.
This is intriguing. Can you give some detail on how it wo
On 12/1/2012 09:32, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>
>> When I want to compile an autotools project, I need sh, which as you have
>>> already said, is only half-legged available on Windows. And that's the
>>> whole point of CMake, especially when Visual C++ is in the middle. Sure,
>>> you can generate
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:15 AM, JonY wrote:
I tried cmake, it didn't like that I was trying to use MSVC inside
> Cygwin by making too many assumptions in the generated makefile. The
> produced Makefile was not gmake compatible.
>
> I thought cmake was supposed to be better than autotools in the r
On 12/1/2012 06:49, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> Now of course, we could
>> try to provide these system-specific files that cmake should be giving
>> us for free, but then we'd have to maintain (thus somehow be able to
>> test) every conceivable system that our users might have or want to
>> use.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, NightStrike wrote:
[...]
> In the cmake world, to do the same thing, Dave has to be a lot more
> knowledgeable of the internals of our project. He needs to know what
> languages we use, what compilers we need, how to call them, how to set
> them up, what the di
Hello,
As I know, wxWidgets uses bakefile(http://www.bakefile.org/index.html)
system. Probably, bakefile is good for cross building of Makefiles for
nmake,mingw-make,make etc.
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
T
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Zouzou wrote:
> On 30/11/12 15:29, NightStrike wrote:
>> In the autotools world, there is a very defined and extremely enforced
>> concept that above all, our goal is to make it *TRIVIAL* for the end
>> user to compile your software. Now let's clarify this. The e
On 30/11/12 15:29, NightStrike wrote:
> In the autotools world, there is a very defined and extremely enforced
> concept that above all, our goal is to make it *TRIVIAL* for the end
> user to compile your software. Now let's clarify this. The end user
> is the guy who knows nothing about developme
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
> wrote:
>> As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
>> available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
>> projects are moving to CMake because m
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> Hey
>
> I thought that this problem was fixed, but it seems it is not. The
> automated builds still have the .la files. Can you remove them, please
> ?
>
> Adrien suggested to use, with gnu tar : --wildcards --exclude="*.la"
>
> thank you
Th
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to use __HrLoadAllImportsForDll with delay loading DLLs, but
> I have not been able to make it work. I wonder if anyone could help me
> please?
Are you still having issues?
> It seems that gcc makes an empty "Delay Imp
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Luis Lavena wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Over the past few months we (RubyInstaller team) have been compiling
> upcoming version of Ruby 2.0 with mingw-w64 in our automated CI
> environment:
>
> http://ci.rubyinstaller.org/
Fantastic! Please join us on irc://irc.oftc.net
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Giovanni Remigi wrote:
> Here a list of some other software compiled with MinGW64
>
> GraphicsMagick - http://www.graphicsmagick.org
> ImageMagick - http://www,imagemagick.org
> Boost - http://www.boost.org
> Botan - http://botan.randombit.net
> Qt 4.8.3 - http://q
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Giovanni Remigi wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the review. I'm not a C++ builder expert as you see :-)
Thanks for your support :)
> Any suggestion to change the toolchain structure to build both in 32 and 64
> bits?
That would require building a multilib toolchain.
16 matches
Mail list logo
