On 09/09/12 23:16, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> Is SEH in 4.7.2 or only in 4.8? How stable is it?
>>
>> SEH is enabled in 4.8 series, not sure about 4.7.3 though.
>
> Only in 4.8. The patch
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ad0b5306ddfc738d6e450528ee9beb281212ea0
>
> was not
>> Is SEH in 4.7.2 or only in 4.8? How stable is it?
>
> SEH is enabled in 4.8 series, not sure about 4.7.3 though.
Only in 4.8. The patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ad0b5306ddfc738d6e450528ee9beb281212ea0
was not applied to 4.7 branch. I'll try to backport.
Peter
On 9/9/2012 20:37, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>
>>> Also no 32/dwarf & 64/SEH? Any technical reasons or simply not supported by
>>> GCC?
>>
>> I think it's impossible. But I'll find out.
>
> That would be great!
AFAIK, no technical reason other than the build system getting in your
way. Not using mult
2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
> But why do you also point to Ruben's scripts, what's the difference?
> Don't your scripts work on Linux?
My scripts were originally created to build MinGW in Windows. I think
it is not right to force Windows users to use Linux to building MinGW.
In addition, most Windows
On 09.09.2012 12:14, niXman wrote:
> 2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
>
>> Ah thanks:
>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Exception%20Handling
>>
>> So until now on 64 bit always SJLJ is used? Or are there alternatives?
>>
>> Is SEH in 4.7.2 or only in 4.8? How stable is it?
>
> As far as I kn
On 09.09.2012 11:46, JonY wrote:
> On 9/9/2012 17:33, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> On 09.09.2012 11:13, niXman wrote:
>>> 2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
>>>
- 32 bit target: dwarf2
>>> Get scripts from Github:
>>> $ git clone g...@github.com:niXman/mingw-builds.git
>>> $ cd mingw-builds
>>> $ ./build gcc-4.
On 09.09.2012 11:13, niXman wrote:
> 2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
>
>> - 32 bit target: dwarf2
> Get scripts from Github:
> $ git clone g...@github.com:niXman/mingw-builds.git
> $ cd mingw-builds
> $ ./build gcc-4.7.1 x32 --dwarf --mingw-compress
Yes, this looks great, I will try them.
But why do you a
2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
> Ah thanks:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Exception%20Handling
>
> So until now on 64 bit always SJLJ is used? Or are there alternatives?
>
> Is SEH in 4.7.2 or only in 4.8? How stable is it?
As far as I know - in 4.8.0. About stability I can not say an
On 9/9/2012 17:33, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 09.09.2012 11:13, niXman wrote:
>> 2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
>>
>>> - 32 bit target: dwarf2
>> Get scripts from Github:
>> $ git clone g...@github.com:niXman/mingw-builds.git
>> $ cd mingw-builds
>> $ ./build gcc-4.7.1 x32 --dwarf --mingw-compress
>>
>>
>>>
On 09.09.2012 11:13, niXman wrote:
> 2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
>
>> - 32 bit target: dwarf2
> Get scripts from Github:
> $ git clone g...@github.com:niXman/mingw-builds.git
> $ cd mingw-builds
> $ ./build gcc-4.7.1 x32 --dwarf --mingw-compress
>
>
>> - 64 bit target: dwarf2 < 4.7.1, SEH > 4.7.1
> dwar
On 08.09.2012 22:00, Luis Lavena wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm starting to use GCC 4.7.1 (win32 threading model) on both win32
> and win64 OS and noticed the executables are no longer prefixed.
>
> Previous builds had the executables prefixed, which I was instructured
> were result of cross-compiled c
2012/9/9 Peter Kümmel:
> - 32 bit target: dwarf2
Get scripts from Github:
$ git clone g...@github.com:niXman/mingw-builds.git
$ cd mingw-builds
$ ./build gcc-4.7.1 x32 --dwarf --mingw-compress
> - 64 bit target: dwarf2 < 4.7.1, SEH > 4.7.1
dwarf is not implemented for 64 bit target.
> - multili
Hello, as you know we are discussing which mingw compiler to use on the Qt
mailing list:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-August/005984.html
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/6026
and we ended in a mingw-w64 compiler version which is not provided by
13 matches
Mail list logo
