On 8/13/2012 8:31 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Kyle wrote:
>> It's *very* slow. If you compare the speed to that of a older FFmpeg,
>> the debug build is practically unusable.
>
> I'm coming into this very late, and I probably can't be of much help,
> but just a thought
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Kyle wrote:
> It's *very* slow. If you compare the speed to that of a older FFmpeg,
> the debug build is practically unusable.
I'm coming into this very late, and I probably can't be of much help,
but just a thought. Have you tried profiling ffmpeg to see where it
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kyle Schwarz wrote:
> On 8/8/2012 8:49 PM, Kyle wrote:
>> On 8/7/2012 3:06 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2012/8/7 Kyle Schwarz :
On 8/6/2012 4:58 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> I have attached a modified version of winpthread (uncomress it and
> rename it back to
On 8/8/2012 8:49 PM, Kyle wrote:
> On 8/7/2012 3:06 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2012/8/7 Kyle Schwarz :
>>> On 8/6/2012 4:58 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
I have attached a modified version of winpthread (uncomress it and
rename it back to .dll). It would be great if you could test this
variant
