Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Strange behavior of snwprintf() function

2012-07-12 Thread JonY
On 7/13/2012 00:21, niXman wrote: > 2012/7/12 niXman: > >> I have only one question: why, with and without the macro results are >> different? > Rafaël has already mentioned POSIX vs non POSIX behavior. > Another strange thing is that none of the developers of mingw-w64 did > not answer, wheth

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] _mingw.h: Introduce the __32LONG macro

2012-07-12 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 7/12/12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi, > > unused so far, but that's the obvious starting point for the entire > operation as discussed on IRC. > > > Corinna > > > * _mingw.h.in (__32LONG): Define. Explain what it's good for. > Any specific reason not to name it __LONG32 or something?

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Strange behavior of snwprintf() function

2012-07-12 Thread niXman
2012/7/12 niXman: > I have only one question: why, with and without the macro results are > different? Another strange thing is that none of the developers of mingw-w64 did not answer, whether it is normal or not. -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-tar

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Strange behavior of snwprintf() function

2012-07-12 Thread niXman
2012/7/11 Rafaël Carré: I have only one question: why, with and without the macro results are different? -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64 bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64 bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/

[Mingw-w64-public] [patch] _mingw.h: Introduce the __32LONG macro

2012-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi, unused so far, but that's the obvious starting point for the entire operation as discussed on IRC. Corinna * _mingw.h.in (__32LONG): Define. Explain what it's good for. Index: _mingw.h.in === --- _mingw.h.in (revisi

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] winternl.h: Define NT_SUCCESS, extend PROCESSINFOCLASS

2012-07-12 Thread Kai Tietz
2012/7/12 Corinna Vinschen : > On Jul 12 12:03, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : >> > On Jul 11 17:28, Kai Tietz wrote: >> >> Hello Corinna, >> >> >> >> 2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > the below patch extends winternl.h slightly. OK to apply? >> >> > >> >>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] winternl.h: Define NT_SUCCESS, extend PROCESSINFOCLASS

2012-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 12 12:03, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : > > On Jul 11 17:28, Kai Tietz wrote: > >> Hello Corinna, > >> > >> 2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > the below patch extends winternl.h slightly. OK to apply? > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Corinna > >> > >>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] winternl.h: Define NT_SUCCESS, extend PROCESSINFOCLASS

2012-07-12 Thread Kai Tietz
2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : > On Jul 11 17:28, Kai Tietz wrote: >> Hello Corinna, >> >> 2012/7/11 Corinna Vinschen : >> > Hi, >> > >> > the below patch extends winternl.h slightly. OK to apply? >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Corinna >> >> patch is ok, could you order enum-values so that they are asc

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Tapi.h and libtapi32

2012-07-12 Thread Peter Schaefer
Am 7/11/2012 11:39 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > Pushed lib32/tapi32.def update to trunk at rev.5204, to stable/v1.x > at rev. 5205 and to stable/v2.x at rev. 5206, so linkage should work > fine now. > > -- > O.S. Am 7/11/2012 1:21 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > trunk: r5212, stable/v1.x: r5213, stable/v2