Hi NightStrike!
Thanks for the follow-up.
But, please, let me emphasize that I don't need anything here -- no urgent
problems. Right now I am using one of Ruben's early std::thread-enabled
builds, and I compile with -static, and everything is fine.
Opportunistically, I like to upgrade from time
Ping, Ruben
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:14 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hello Ruben!
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>> 2012/5/14 K. Frank
>> ...
>>>
>>> Did you remember to compile with "-static"?
>>>
>>> (I'm only half joking. I just burnt up a couple of hours tracking d
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:05 PM, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
> Dear list readers, beginners,
>
> i have made a small tutorial on how to get MinGW MSYS / MinGW-w64
> up and running, as well as how to compile Qt 4.8.1 as dynamic and
> static, how to configure Qt Creator to use the MinGW-w64 toolchain
> a
On 6/18/2012 23:37, Christian Franke wrote:
> JonY wrote:
>> On 6/18/2012 17:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> FYI, you can add "libvirt" (http://libvirt.org) to the list of
>>> "Projects successfully using MinGW-w64" on the front page of
>>> your website. Thanks for all the MinGW-w64 project's gre
JonY wrote:
> On 6/18/2012 17:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> FYI, you can add "libvirt" (http://libvirt.org) to the list of
>> "Projects successfully using MinGW-w64" on the front page of
>> your website. Thanks for all the MinGW-w64 project's great work
>> & long may it continue.
>>
>> Regards,
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:31 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[...]
>> I think I now know how to compute the establisher frame value. This is
>> simply what is advertised by Frame Reg and Frame Offset in UNWIND_INFO. The
>> patch is appended belo
On 18 June 2012 08:32, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Op 18 jun. 2012 13:29 schreef "Ruben Van Boxem" het volgende:
>> I'll reupload them in a few hours. Stupid Sourceforge... :P
>
> You can see the files through ftp, so they were there already. I reuploaded
> them anyway, let's hope SF decides to sync i
Op 18 jun. 2012 13:29 schreef "Ruben Van Boxem"
het volgende:
>
> Op 18 jun. 2012 13:15 schreef "Chris Sutcliffe" het
volgende:
>
> >
> > On 17 June 2012 21:17, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe
wrote:
> > >> On 17 June 2012 09:29, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> here come my 5-cent on that. First libmingw32.a and libmingwex.a are
> two pretty different things.
>
I'll throw in 2 more cents worth. The mingwex was started by
mingw.org and meant to contain code maintained by us that exten
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>
>> 2012/6/8 Tristan Gingold :
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>>
Hello Tristan,
Thanks for working on this. The patch is ok. As JonY said, unified
d
Op 18 jun. 2012 13:15 schreef "Chris Sutcliffe" het
volgende:
>
> On 17 June 2012 21:17, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe
wrote:
> >> On 17 June 2012 09:29, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> >>> I have uploaded the newest GCC release 4.7.1 to the MinGW-w64 SF.net
>
On 6/18/2012 17:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> FYI, you can add "libvirt" (http://libvirt.org) to the list of
> "Projects successfully using MinGW-w64" on the front page of
> your website. Thanks for all the MinGW-w64 project's great work
> & long may it continue.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
Done.
On 17 June 2012 21:17, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> On 17 June 2012 09:29, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> I have uploaded the newest GCC release 4.7.1 to the MinGW-w64 SF.net
>>> website.
>>
>> Anybody else have them as showing non-downloadable even
FYI, you can add "libvirt" (http://libvirt.org) to the list of
"Projects successfully using MinGW-w64" on the front page of
your website. Thanks for all the MinGW-w64 project's great work
& long may it continue.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/db
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>> You're. Somehow trying to build with -m32, which is multilib, which is not
>> enabled in my build. I'm not sure why gcc doesn't complain; it should. If
>> you want to build 32-bit
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> You're. Somehow trying to build with -m32, which is multilib, which is not
> enabled in my build. I'm not sure why gcc doesn't complain; it should. If
> you want to build 32-bit binaries with my toolchains, you will have to
> download the
16 matches
Mail list logo
