Yaakov, ping.
Not sure if you still have interest to get your patch into our
repository. The part about hiding dllimport needs a change in your
patch. Also your changes about MIDL part (see Jacek's comment for
this) need adjustment. I am still waiting for a revised version or it.
As soon as this
On 11.6.2012 18:48, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Jim Michaels wrote:
>> other stuff now compiles just fine (well, except for the ones that are
>> unix-specific like jack audio, and apache modules). :-(
>>
>> looks like I am not going to be doing much with Jack audio server
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> 2027 auto build 32-bit windows.
> here is my fstab:
> $ cat /etc/fstab
> c:/ /c
> e:/ /e
> c:/prj /prj
> c:/prj/fltk /fltk
> c:/wxWidgets-2.9.3 /wx
> c:/mingw-w32-bin_i686-mingw_2027 /mingw
> c:/mingw-w64-bin_i686-mingw_2027 /mingw6
2012/6/11 Baruch Burstein:
> Does mingw-w64 support the new c++11 header?
Yes. See Ruben`s builds or my builds:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/
--
Regards,
niXman
___
Dual-target(32 & 64 bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64 bit Windows
On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/6/8 Tristan Gingold :
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Tristan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this. The patch is ok. As JonY said, unified
>>> diffs are more welcome ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/6/8 Tristan Gingold :
On Windows 8 Release Preview with GCC 4.7.1 (prerelease), this crash
doesn't happen anymore, whether it was the os or gcc.
2012/6/5 Ruben Van Boxem :
> 2012/6/4 Deniz Sarikaya
>>
>> 2012/6/4 Ruben Van Boxem :
>> > Op 4 jun. 2012 23:06 schreef "Deniz Sarikaya"
>> > het
>> > volgende:
>> >
>> >
>>
Does mingw-w64 support the new c++11 header?
--
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape h
2012/6/9 Xiaofan Chen :
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
>> wrote:
>>> What do you mean? MinGW-w64 is completely seperate from the Windows SDK and
>>> whatever they leave out of it. If anything MinGW-w64 will become really
>>