> Off-topic:
> Sorry for the OT, but I wanted to point out that MSVC is actually free. The
> higher-end versions of Visual Studio cost money, but the express editions are
> free, as is the standalone Windows SDK, both of which provide a complete
> development environment including MSVC.
Yes Josh
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Anthony Walter wrote:
> I fixed the problem. It was caused by out of order link lib statements. Link
> order is important sometimes.
s/sometimes/always
--
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd
---
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Joshua Boyce
wrote:
>
> I didn't mean that an additional import library was required, simply that
> the correct import lib needs to be linked in as normal (just like you do
> when using windows.h). For functions exported by kernel32 this
> happens automatically, fo
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
> Dear list readers, beginners,
>
> i have made a small tutorial on how to get MinGW MSYS / MinGW-w64
> up and running, as well as how to compile Qt 4.8.1 as dynamic and
> static, how to configure Qt Creator to use the MinGW-w64 toolchain
>
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, K. Frank wrote:
>
> And it shaves about six seconds (about 40%) off of the compilation
> time of a small, three-file test program. (Oh, well ... Less time to
> read xkcd ... http://xkcd.com/303/)
>
>
What is the time difference if you continue to use Windows.h
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2012/5/15 K. Frank
>
> Hi Joshua!
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Joshua Boyce
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:08 AM, K. Frank wrote:
>> >>
>> >> By the way, a quick semi-related question: To use native windows
>> >> Sl
