Hi,
this case is indeed interesting, but as far as I understood was last
decision in this case that Google seems to have copied some Oracle's (well
Sun's) files for testing-purposes. There are enough more detailed
descriptions to be found in the internet. Nevertheless the subject you
state here
On 5/13/2012 00:21, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
> Dear list readers,
>
>>> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
>>> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
>>> "derecommendation".
>> Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
>> some
Dear list readers,
>> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
>> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
>> "derecommendation".
> Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
> some critical differences from other GCC distributions
On 5/12/2012 3:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> I'm just trying to sensitize you for the consequences of your
> compat-breaking changes, which are the sole reason for my
> "derecommendation".
Consider your point made, but understand this: TDM-GCC certainly has
some critical differences from othe
On 5/12/2012 22:11, Whitequill Riclo wrote:
>> Is there a something on the directory tree I need so the script can run
>> correctly?
You really need to fix your quoting or your mail client.
No, just make -f should do. Use the host-tools-check target
to check your required host tools. eg.:
make
Just for clarification: In the def file, you will see a few C-compliant
methods. These are the one i call from my main binary, along with DeviceConfig
and Config constructors and destructors.
The only other function called from the main binary is SC::StaticInitializer,
it's a static declaring it
Hmm, I doubt that the code for delay-load support makes a differenceof calling-convention of exports. Only important thing is that thosefunction are declared with proper calling-convention prototype.That's exactly what JonY told me when we attacked this problem (He was of a great help regarding th
2012/5/12 MARTIN Pierre :
> Dear list readers,
>
> i'm enjoying my free time to migrate all my projects on the MinGW-w64
> compiler toolchain.
> i am using Ruben's build right now, and it is working exactly as expected
> (All my project compile as well as the 3rd party project they need).
> My go
Dear list readers,
i'm enjoying my free time to migrate all my projects on the MinGW-w64 compiler
toolchain.
i am using Ruben's build right now, and it is working exactly as expected (All
my project compile as well as the 3rd party project they need).
My goal being to achieve the same thing i wa
2012/5/12 John E. / TDM
> On 5/11/2012 9:10 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > Yes, TDM's toolchain is a native build. but please don't use it, it's
> > old (by now) and as you can see has installation problems
>
> :(
>
> With these two frankly unfounded generalizations, you may be scaring off
> quit
10 matches
Mail list logo
