to : Jonathan Wakely
I am interested to join you on windows threading , shall we talk over gtalk
?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:28 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hello Gabriel (and Ruben)!
>
> By the way, I'm the guy Ruben mentioned in his subsequent post.
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Gabriel Dos Re
That is brilliant and I will have to add you to my gtalk after your
permission :0
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hi Moatz!
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, moatz shawki
> wrote:
> > regarding c++11 . is it the new c++ standard ?
>
> Yes, c++11 is the new standard. It's w
Hi Moatz!
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, moatz shawki wrote:
> regarding c++11 . is it the new c++ standard ?
Yes, c++11 is the new standard. It's what you get "experimental"
support for in recent version of gcc (including 4.7.0) if you compile
using "g++ -std=c++0x".
(c++0x was the previous
Hello Ruben and Gabriel!
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2012/5/6 Gabriel Dos Reis
>>
>> Including the mingw64 project about this.
>>
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>> > For GCC 4.7 I enabled most of (without timed mutexes) on Mac ...
>> >
regarding c++11 . is it the new c++ standard ?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:28 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hello Gabriel (and Ruben)!
>
> By the way, I'm the guy Ruben mentioned in his subsequent post.
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> wrote:
> > Including the mingw64 project about
Hello Gabriel (and Ruben)!
By the way, I'm the guy Ruben mentioned in his subsequent post.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
> Including the mingw64 project about this.
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> For GCC 4.7 I enabled most of (without t
