Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Off-topic about Cygwin / MSVC

2012-04-20 Thread MARTIN Pierre
>> Is there anyone aware of some kind of wrapper so i could use the MSVC >> compiler with either MSYS or cygwin? By that, i mean that i have bash >> scripts which perform under either linux, macos and windows, and i would >> like to be able to use them as well in cohesion with the MSVC compiler.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingw-users] hello world

2012-04-20 Thread MARTIN Pierre
> thank you very much for the additional info.. Yes, you are wright, I did this > just because I wanted to see that the compiler works. My real application > will require arguments anyway. > Thanks a lot for your help. No problem, glad i could help you. Have fun! Pierre. --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Off-topic about Cygwin / MSVC

2012-04-20 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:49 AM, MARTIN Pierre wrote: > Dear MinGW-w64 readers, > > Is there anyone aware of some kind of wrapper so i could use the MSVC > compiler with either MSYS or cygwin? By that, i mean that i have bash scripts > which perform under either linux, macos and windows, and i w

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Off-topic about Cygwin / MSVC

2012-04-20 Thread Teemu Nätkinniemi
On 20.4.2012 14:49, MARTIN Pierre wrote: > Is there anyone aware of some kind of wrapper so i could use the MSVC > compiler with either MSYS or cygwin? By that, i mean that i have bash scripts > which perform under either linux, macos and windows, and i would like to be > able to use them as we

[Mingw-w64-public] Off-topic about Cygwin / MSVC

2012-04-20 Thread MARTIN Pierre
Dear MinGW-w64 readers, Is there anyone aware of some kind of wrapper so i could use the MSVC compiler with either MSYS or cygwin? By that, i mean that i have bash scripts which perform under either linux, macos and windows, and i would like to be able to use them as well in cohesion with the M

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingw-users] hello world

2012-04-20 Thread MARTIN Pierre
Please post to the mailing list, if you only post to me and i answer you with a misstake, no one will be able to correct me :) > thank you very much for your quick response. I just tried with a "viod" > instead and it works fine now. You shouldn't use void as your main arguments for two reasons: