Re: [Mingw-w64-public] gdiplus headers

2011-11-15 Thread Mark Dootson
On 13/11/2011 19:41, Kai Tietz wrote: Sure, patch would be welcome. I need some help with autoconf I think. (my first attempt) patch at http://www.wxperl.co.uk/gdiplus-files.patch adds necessary files and is straightforward. Attached file gdiplus-autoconf.patch contains my changes to conf

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confused about prefix x86_64-w64-mingw32

2011-11-15 Thread Earnie
Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > > This probably is mentioned somewhere on the wiki, but heck, here > goes: The "x86_64-w64-mingw32" and "i686-w64-mingw32" are target > triplets: - The first part is the archtecture: x86_64 (64-bit) and > i686 (32-bit) - w64 is the "vendor" part, usually it's pc, unknown, >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confused about prefix x86_64-w64-mingw32

2011-11-15 Thread JonY
On 11/16/2011 06:04, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2011/11/15 Erik Leunissen > >> Hi all, >> >> Having used mingw for years as a linux-i686 hosted cross compiler >> targeting mingw32, I've recently installed an automated build[*] of a >> cross-toolchain to generate 64bit binaries (hosted on the same p

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confused about prefix x86_64-w64-mingw32

2011-11-15 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2011/11/15 Erik Leunissen > Hi all, > > Having used mingw for years as a linux-i686 hosted cross compiler > targeting mingw32, I've recently installed an automated build[*] of a > cross-toolchain to generate 64bit binaries (hosted on the same platform > linux-i686). > > [*] downloaded from th

[Mingw-w64-public] Confused about prefix x86_64-w64-mingw32

2011-11-15 Thread Erik Leunissen
Hi all, Having used mingw for years as a linux-i686 hosted cross compiler targeting mingw32, I've recently installed an automated build[*] of a cross-toolchain to generate 64bit binaries (hosted on the same platform linux-i686). [*] downloaded from the MinGW-w64 project site at sourceforg

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] v2.0 vs 1.0

2011-11-15 Thread Kai Tietz
2011/11/15 Prof Brian Ripley : > I can't find a clear statement about the status of these two branches. > If there is one, can someone point me to it? > > I guess the short version is 'is 2.0 intended for production use yet?' > > Brian Ripley Yes, 2.0 version is new "stable" release version. Kai

[Mingw-w64-public] v2.0 vs 1.0

2011-11-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I can't find a clear statement about the status of these two branches. If there is one, can someone point me to it? I guess the short version is 'is 2.0 intended for production use yet?' Brian Ripley -- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, h

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RegUnLoadKeyA/W still in lib64/kernel32.def

2011-11-15 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Mark Dootson wrote: > Hi, > > RegUnLoadKeyA > RegUnLoadKeyW > > are still in lib64/kernel32.def. > > Reg functions live in advapi32.def. These two were missed when other reg > functions were commented out. > > Rgds > > Mark Fixed in the svn repo (stable/v2.x rev.

[Mingw-w64-public] RegUnLoadKeyA/W still in lib64/kernel32.def

2011-11-15 Thread Mark Dootson
Hi, RegUnLoadKeyA RegUnLoadKeyW are still in lib64/kernel32.def. Reg functions live in advapi32.def. These two were missed when other reg functions were commented out. Rgds Mark -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 b

[Mingw-w64-public] new make package (3.82.90-20111115)

2011-11-15 Thread Ozkan Sezer
used. Updated package make-3.82.90-2015.zip is available now: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/External%20binary%20packages%20%28Win64%20hosted%29/make/make-3.82.90-2015.zip/download This is built from today's make CVS with patches from following Savannah bugzilla en

[Mingw-w64-public] new make package uploaded

2011-11-15 Thread Ozkan Sezer
Uploaded new GNU make package make-3.82.90-2014.zip. This is a build of CVS snapshot from Nov. 14 2011 which includes windows jobserver support, so testing is recommended, I guess. The package has x86 and amd64 binaries, as well as the source and build scripts I used. Umm, here's a link: http: