Re: [Mingw-w64-public] _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2011-10-12 Thread Mook
On 10/12/2011 6:47 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, JonY wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 18:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> Please do the same in stable/v2.x (and remember to >>> update revstamp.h to 2011-10-12 / 4541, too.) >>> >> >> How do you update it? It says "/* Do not edit. Auto

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2011-10-12 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, JonY wrote: > On 10/12/2011 18:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, JonY wrote: >>> On 10/12/2011 07:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, JonY wrote: >> > [...] >> Am I doing somet

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2011-10-12 Thread JonY
On 10/12/2011 18:17, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, JonY wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 07:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, JonY wrote: >>> > >>> [...] >>> > Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug in MinGW-W64's implementation >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2011-10-12 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, JonY wrote: > On 10/12/2011 07:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, JonY wrote: >> >>> >> [...] >> Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug in MinGW-W64's implementation >>> of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS? >>> >>> Yes, lo

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2011-10-12 Thread JonY
On 10/12/2011 07:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, JonY wrote: > >>> >> > [...] > >>> Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug in MinGW-W64's implementation >> of >>> _FILE_OFFSET_BITS? >>> >> >> Yes, looks like I forgot the part about stat. Try this patch: >> >