On 9/19/2011 06:53, Kyle wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 6:43 PM, JonY wrote:
>> On 9/19/2011 02:33, Kyle wrote:
>>> I used to use that option but I believe it was removed. grep -ir
>>> "enable-fully-dynamic-strings" * on the source dir turns up nothing.
>> Check libstdc++v3/configure.
>
> It can be found
On 9/19/2011 06:59, xunxun wrote:
> 于 2011/9/19 2:33, Kyle 写道:
>> I used to use that option but I believe it was removed. grep -ir
>> "enable-fully-dynamic-strings" * on the source dir turns up nothing.
> It's a typo.
> It should be "enable-fully-dynamic-string", and it can be found in
> libstdc++
Hello Venu!
I have taken the liberty of copying this post to the mingw-w64 list,
as it's relevant there, as well.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:18 PM, veegee wrote:
>
> Hi K. Frank:
>
>>> To follow up on an earlier suggestion in this thread: Why not use the
>>> standard
>>> std::thread facilities o
于 2011/9/19 2:33, Kyle 写道:
> I used to use that option but I believe it was removed. grep -ir
> "enable-fully-dynamic-strings" * on the source dir turns up nothing.
It's a typo.
It should be "enable-fully-dynamic-string", and it can be found in
libstdc++-v3/configure.
--
Best Regards,
xunxun
-
On 9/18/2011 6:43 PM, JonY wrote:
> On 9/19/2011 02:33, Kyle wrote:
>> I used to use that option but I believe it was removed. grep -ir
>> "enable-fully-dynamic-strings" * on the source dir turns up nothing.
> Check libstdc++v3/configure.
It can be found in libstdc++v3/configure, but it's
--ena
On 9/19/2011 02:33, Kyle wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 7:17 AM, JonY wrote:
>> Objective C seems to be affecting your issue.
>
> Any chance of a quick fix?
>
>> BTW, please use "--enable-fully-dynamic-strings" for gcc. I can't
>> emphasize this point enough to anybody rolling their own mingw-w64 gcc
>> b
On 9/18/2011 7:17 AM, JonY wrote:
> Objective C seems to be affecting your issue.
Any chance of a quick fix?
> BTW, please use "--enable-fully-dynamic-strings" for gcc. I can't
> emphasize this point enough to anybody rolling their own mingw-w64 gcc
> binaries.
I used to use that option but I be
2011/9/18 JonY :
> On 9/18/2011 19:42, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> Op 18 sep. 2011 13:18 schreef "JonY" het
>> volgende:
>>>
>>> On 9/18/2011 14:10, Kyle wrote:
On 9/18/2011 1:01 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> You're going to have to provide a lot more detail, then, about your
> build procedu
On 9/18/2011 19:42, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Op 18 sep. 2011 13:18 schreef "JonY" het
> volgende:
>>
>> On 9/18/2011 14:10, Kyle wrote:
>>> On 9/18/2011 1:01 AM, NightStrike wrote:
You're going to have to provide a lot more detail, then, about your
build procedure. We made a script to d
Op 18 sep. 2011 13:18 schreef "JonY" het
volgende:
>
> On 9/18/2011 14:10, Kyle wrote:
> > On 9/18/2011 1:01 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> >> You're going to have to provide a lot more detail, then, about your
> >> build procedure. We made a script to do it all for you to make the
> >> process easier
On 9/18/2011 14:10, Kyle wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 1:01 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>> You're going to have to provide a lot more detail, then, about your
>> build procedure. We made a script to do it all for you to make the
>> process easier to understand and troubleshoot. If you are doing it
>> yourself
11 matches
Mail list logo
