> >>> In order to get Python distutils fixed here:
> >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue12641
> >>>
> >>> We need to know when the -mno-cygwin option was rendered
> >>> unnecessary. The documentation conflicts itself, as explained in
> >>> the bug report. The commit removing the option is at the GCC 4
Jon wrote:
>>> In order to get Python distutils fixed here:
>>> http://bugs.python.org/issue12641
>>>
>>> We need to know when the -mno-cygwin option was rendered
>>> unnecessary. The documentation conflicts itself, as explained in
>>> the bug report. The commit removing the option is at the GCC 4.
> > In order to get Python distutils fixed here:
> > http://bugs.python.org/issue12641
> >
> > We need to know when the -mno-cygwin option was rendered unnecessary.
> > The documentation conflicts itself, as explained in the bug report.
> > The commit removing the option is at the GCC 4.4 timeframe
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:43 AM, PcX wrote:
> 于 2011/8/3 18:16, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
>
> Seeing that the mingw-w64 project's resources are limited
>
> But libmangle and gendef are not limited, we can't make the tools as
> libmangle and gendef?
> I don't know this concrete meaning. Can you provide th
2011/8/3 PcX :
> 于 2011/8/3 18:16, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
>
> Seeing that the mingw-w64 project's resources are limited
>
> But libmangle and gendef are not limited, we can't make the tools as
> libmangle and gendef?
> I don't know this concrete meaning. Can you provide the details to avoid me
> to br
于 2011/8/3 18:16, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
Seeing that the mingw-w64 project's resources are limited
But libmangle and gendef are not limited, we can't make the tools as
libmangle and gendef?
I don't know this concrete meaning. Can you provide the details to avoid
me to break the limitation?
Thank
2011/8/3 PcX :
> 于 2011/8/3 18:07, PcX 写道:
>> Yea, we can use VC tools editbin to do the same thing.
> btw, can MinGW64 project develop a tool like the editbin?
Seeing that the mingw-w64 project's resources are limited and
GCC/binutils have enough problems as it is, this would be unlikely (if
it d
于 2011/8/3 18:07, PcX 写道:
> Yea, we can use VC tools editbin to do the same thing.
btw, can MinGW64 project develop a tool like the editbin?
--
Best Regards,
PcX
--
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisc
于 2011/8/3 17:57, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
> Ah, crap. Forgot about that. I will put it in the next version.
> Remember you can use Visual Studio's editbin
> (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/d25ddyfc.aspx) to do the same
> thing. Make sure you get all the executables to be sure:
> mingw32/bin/ld
2011/8/3 PcX :
> 于 2011/8/3 17:21, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have finished an updated Personal build for everyone interested. I
> also provided an update to the Clang addon, although not a lot changed
> on that front, unfortunately.
>
> LTO is still broken, but the bug report block
? 2011/8/3 17:21, Ruben Van Boxem ??:
Hi everyone,
I have finished an updated Personal build for everyone interested. I
also provided an update to the Clang addon, although not a lot changed
on that front, unfortunately.
LTO is still broken, but the bug report blocking it contains a useful
work
Hi everyone,
I have finished an updated Personal build for everyone interested. I
also provided an update to the Clang addon, although not a lot changed
on that front, unfortunately.
LTO is still broken, but the bug report blocking it contains a useful
workaround: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/s
12 matches
Mail list logo
