2011/7/23 Eugen Dedu :
> On 23/07/11 18:15, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Eugen Dedu
>> wrote:
>>> On 23/07/11 14:42, NightStrike wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> On 22/07/11 15:38, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 20
On 23/07/11 18:15, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Eugen Dedu
> wrote:
>> On 23/07/11 14:42, NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Dedu
>>> wrote:
On 22/07/11 15:38, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Dedu
>
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> On 23/07/11 14:42, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Dedu
>> wrote:
>>> On 22/07/11 15:38, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I sent this to IR
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Christian Franke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jun 23, 2011, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for providing mingw-w64.
>>
>> I found this when I tried to compile smartmontools on Cygwin with
>> i686-w64-mingw32 and _USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO set:
>>
>> __mingw_*scanf()
On 23/07/11 14:42, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Dedu
> wrote:
>> On 22/07/11 15:38, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Dedu
>>> wrote:
Hi,
(I sent this to IRC but nobody answered.)
I have a big linux applicatio
On 07/23/2011 02:54 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> i try to find any kind of information about the release plan or roadmap,
>> but i can't find it.
>> is there any plan about the 1.0 final release?
>> thanks.
>> regards.
>
> There is not
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i try to find any kind of information about the release plan or roadmap,
> but i can't find it.
> is there any plan about the 1.0 final release?
> thanks.
> regards.
There is not. We should make one. I admit that I have been a
road
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Oh... I can provide the exact syntax from wincrypt.h:
>>
>
>
> Please don't.
I think we can do this on the -doc email list that Jon set up for this
purpose. Jon, please correct me here.
Hi,
On Jun 23, 2011, Christian Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for providing mingw-w64.
>
> I found this when I tried to compile smartmontools on Cygwin with
> i686-w64-mingw32 and _USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO set:
>
> __mingw_*scanf() always(!) segfaults if a char or string format
> (without malloc opt
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Alen Skondro wrote:
> This helped!
> binutils can now create i686 and x86_64 targets and GCC discovered this!
> Thank you guys for your expertise!
>
> The only problem I'm still having is that the $PREFIX\i686-w64-mingw32\lib
> contains 32bit libraries but GCC looks
PcX,
Is this still an issue, or did you figure it out in other threads?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:59 AM, PcX wrote:
> 于 2011/7/11 19:13, Kai Tietz 写道:
>>
>> Another thing missing here is the use of lock as prefix ...
>
> I update to winpthreads svn 4271:
>
> this is a debug log
>
> GNU gdb (pcx3
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> On 22/07/11 15:38, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Dedu
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (I sent this to IRC but nobody answered.)
>>>
>>> I have a big linux application and I use mingw to build it for windows
>>> too. W
12 matches
Mail list logo