On 5/3/2011 04:05, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/5/2 Peter Rockett :
>> On 02/05/2011 17:00, Keith Marshall wrote:
>>> On 02/05/11 16:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
> So, we would like sqrt (x) and pow (x, 0.5) to agree.
>>
>> The point below about off-topic diversions into precision is valid but
>> can I
On 5/2/2011 22:48, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
> I never implied your ears were defective. And I meant no offence, but I did
> not get any reaction so I thought I'd stir things up a bit. You pursued a
> better solution, which is great of course! Thanks for that.
>
> Still leaves the /mingw directory
2011/5/2 NightStrike
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the
> autobuilds
> > are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience, they run a bit
> > slower on my machine. Don't know why, haven't test
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:55 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the
> autobuilds
> > are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience, they run a bit
> > slower on my machine
> My ears work fine. I even went so far as to get the GCC guys to fix
> the install-strip target so that we can properly create a stripped
> version. We just have to modify the buildbot to work with the new
> target.
That's great news. FWIW, I'd recently run
for /r mingw-w64 %f in (*.exe) do st
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the autobuilds
> are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience, they run a bit
> slower on my machine. Don't know why, haven't tested it really, more like a
> feeling
