Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 04/22/2011 11:15 AM, JonY wrote:
>> You'll likely see an improvement by running make in parallel.
>
> Is that possible with MinGW? I have tried various guides on the net,
> with various combinations of gmake, make, msys-make, QT jom and
> whatever I could find
Hi,
On 04/22/2011 11:15 AM, JonY wrote:
> You'll likely see an improvement by running make in parallel.
Is that possible with MinGW? I have tried various guides on the net,
with various combinations of gmake, make, msys-make, QT jom and whatever
I could find - without any luck! They all seem ign
2011/4/22 JonY
> On 4/22/2011 22:33, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > Op 22 apr. 2011 16:25 schreef "Mario Emmenlauer"
> het
> > volgende:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 04/22/2011 11:15 AM, JonY wrote:
> >>> You'll likely see an improvement by running make in parallel.
> >>
> >> Is that possible wit
On 4/22/2011 22:33, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Op 22 apr. 2011 16:25 schreef "Mario Emmenlauer" het
> volgende:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/22/2011 11:15 AM, JonY wrote:
>>> You'll likely see an improvement by running make in parallel.
>>
>> Is that possible with MinGW? I have tried various guides on t
Op 22 apr. 2011 16:25 schreef "Mario Emmenlauer" het
volgende:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 04/22/2011 11:15 AM, JonY wrote:
> > You'll likely see an improvement by running make in parallel.
>
> Is that possible with MinGW? I have tried various guides on the net,
> with various combinations of gmake, make, ms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/22/2011 19:58, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you misunderstand my intention (and are bound to not answer my
>>> question, it seems). All I need is a description of what is done by the
>>> build system (ie what files are compiled into what and
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2011/4/22 JonY
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 4/22/2011 16:05, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> > I'd like to rid the whole thing of bash, so I can build from windows
>> > cmd,
>> > just like clang. It should also
2011/4/22 JonY
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/22/2011 16:05, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > I'd like to rid the whole thing of bash, so I can build from windows cmd,
> > just like clang. It should also speed things up (MSYS is very slow)
> >
> > Ruben
>
> That is hardly a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/22/2011 16:05, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> I'd like to rid the whole thing of bash, so I can build from windows cmd,
> just like clang. It should also speed things up (MSYS is very slow)
>
> Ruben
That is hardly a reason to make and maintain two se
I find bash very powerful and easy to use, if a bit difficult to get started
because of arcane and sometimes difficult text-translation rules and
conditional statement syntax. The Windows command interpreter is almost
identical to the DOS batch language; I recommend that you look at
powershell, wh
I've used 64-bit Fortran (gfortran, Fortran 95 code) under 64-bit Windows
Vista and it tests well. I haven't tried it under Windows 7 64-bit but I
just got a notebook that runs that and will try it, but I believe that the
kernel is pretty much the same as that of Vista with the latest SPs and both
I'd like to rid the whole thing of bash, so I can build from windows cmd,
just like clang. It should also speed things up (MSYS is very slow)
Ruben
Op 22 apr. 2011 02:44 schreef "JonY" het
volgende:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/22/2011 00:38, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
