Jim,
msvcrt.dll lives in C:\Windows\system32, which is in my PATH variable.
Remember, the dll w/o the fortran stuff works, the one with doesn't.
thx.,
H.
On 4/16/2011 2:47 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> I should mention that one of those functions relies on msvcrt
> apparently, which is a microsoft
I should mention that one of those functions relies on msvcrt apparently, which
is a microsoft runtime DLL. if it's not present in the PATH, the program
probably will not run?
C:\downloads\attachments_2011_04_16>grep msvcrt *dump.txt
f_dump.txt: DLL Name: msvcrt.dll
f_dump.txt:[1017](sec 6
I can see that the function lists are different by about 12 or so functions in
different places, kind of scattered.
more on the fortran side than on the other side.
I also can't remember how important this is in a DLL (whether they are supposed
to match exactly).
C:\downloads\attachments_2011_0
- Original Message -
From: "Ruben Van Boxem"
>
> Three tests of MPFR 3.0.1 fail on mingw-w64, (sezero's 4.5.2 x64
> build). The "make check" log is attached.
>
If your build is seen as a cross-compilation (which, I think, happens if you
provide --build and --host arguments to configure
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reporting it here first, because I don't know (haven't looked) how
> to fix it, or if there is already a fix upstream.
>
> Three tests of MPFR 3.0.1 fail on mingw-w64, (sezero's 4.5.2 x64
> build). The "make check" log is attach
Hi,
In my non-stop (*cough*) attempts to get GCC built, I've stumbled on
undefined references in the MPC build. When linking the final library
together, I get undefined references to (I think) every function
defined in the library.
Accompanying this... mildly uncomfortable... issue, is a lot of th
Hi,
I'm reporting it here first, because I don't know (haven't looked) how
to fix it, or if there is already a fix upstream.
Three tests of MPFR 3.0.1 fail on mingw-w64, (sezero's 4.5.2 x64
build). The "make check" log is attached.
Ruben
test.log
Description: Binary data
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/2011 15:23, Jim Michaels wrote:
> Could the compiler writes for personal builds and auto builds please redesign
> the compilers so that the 64-bit compilers use different library names for
> their
> dll's than the 32-bit counterparts? you c
Op 16 apr. 2011 08:44 schreef "Jim Michaels" het
volgende:
>
> what processors does "Targeting_win64" or the other 64-bit targets target?
>
> AMD64?
>
> or does it also work with Intel EM64T or whatever it was called (things
are getting fuzzy)?
The instruction set on both types of processorsb is
Could the compiler writes for personal builds and auto builds please redesign
the compilers so that the 64-bit compilers use different library names for
their
dll's than the 32-bit counterparts? you can't put them both into the same
directory and have it work.
one of the problems I am having,
10 matches
Mail list logo