Re: [Mingw-w64-public] change to toupper and tolower standard definition in

2011-03-22 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, NightStrike wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Jim Michaels wrote: >> >>> I don't know who to go to to make this change request to the c library >>> standard (ANSI C Library?). >>> it would not break any ex

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] __FUNCTION__ macro

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Leder
On 22/03/2011 11:46, Тихомиров Валентин wrote: > The convenient tracing construction > #define LOG(LogTypeString,format,...) printf("%s[" __FUNCTION__ "] > "format, LogTypeString, __VA_ARGS__) > fails with error: expected ')' before '__FUNCTION__' > Is it ok? It's not a macro; it just looks like o

[Mingw-w64-public] __FUNCTION__ macro

2011-03-22 Thread Тихомиров Валентин
The convenient tracing construction #define LOG(LogTypeString,format,...)  printf("%s[" __FUNCTION__ "] "format, LogTypeString, __VA_ARGS__)  fails with  error: expected ')' before '__FUNCTION__'  Is it ok? -- Enable your

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] change to toupper and tolower standard definition in

2011-03-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, NightStrike wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Jim Michaels wrote: I don't know who to go to to make this change request to the c library standard (ANSI C Library?). it would not break any existing code, but it would make the function EVER more useful! Microsoft mai