Re: [Mingw-w64-public] why aren't "secure" _s functions provided?

2011-02-28 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/1/2011 08:27, Dock, Dion wrote: > Why doesn't MinGW-64, etc. provide equivalents to Microsoft's secure > functions, for example, strcat_s, strncpy_s, etc.? I understand they're not > part of the C standard, but the distribution includes various

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] having trouble using WinSDK function

2011-02-28 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/1/2011 08:19, Dock, Dion wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Jon [mailto:10wa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of JonY >> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:36 PM >> To: Dock, Dion >> Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Min

[Mingw-w64-public] why aren't "secure" _s functions provided?

2011-02-28 Thread Dock, Dion
Why doesn't MinGW-64, etc. provide equivalents to Microsoft's secure functions, for example, strcat_s, strncpy_s, etc.? I understand they're not part of the C standard, but the distribution includes various bits that contain Microsoft functions, e.g. MessageBox. I'm curious as to whether this

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] having trouble using WinSDK function

2011-02-28 Thread Dock, Dion
> -Original Message- > From: Jon [mailto:10wa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of JonY > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:36 PM > To: Dock, Dion > Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] having trouble using WinSDK function > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] undefined reference to __GSHandlerCheck

2011-02-28 Thread Dock, Dion
> -Original Message- > From: Jon [mailto:10wa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of JonY > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:50 PM > To: Dock, Dion > Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] undefined reference to __GSHandlerCheck > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Is the MingW-w64's bug?

2011-02-28 Thread Kai Tietz
2011/2/28 Chris Sutcliffe : >> I used mingw-w64 to compile QT source on windws server 2003., but >> failed. The error message is "5 OpenProcessToken could not be >> located in KERNEL32.dll" >> I find a whole day, but also does not have a solution. >> >> Develop enviroment:: >> mingw-w64: 2011.02.20

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Is the MingW-w64's bug?

2011-02-28 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
> I used mingw-w64 to compile QT source on windws server 2003., but > failed. The error message is "5 OpenProcessToken could not be > located in KERNEL32.dll" > I find a whole day, but also does not have a solution. > > Develop enviroment:: > mingw-w64: 2011.02.20 , gcc version is 4.5.3 > qt source