2010/9/28 Ozkan Sezer :
>
> Off-topic: From this, I assume my 4.5 build (well, at least the src of it)
> is just fine, yes? Maybe I intend making binary builds based on 4.5.
>
> --
> O.S.
>
Your sources built fine, but I needed to change some steps in your
native_w64_build.sh: namely gmp, gcc, b
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> HI guys,
>
> I have managed to get another build out. This time I left out
> (cloog-)ppl, and thus the Graphite optimizations. These things just
> kept bugging me, hard. I used GCC 4.6 from 20100918 (the 20100925 had
> a bug in lto which ma
2010/9/28 Ozkan Sezer :
>
> Your src-4.6-20100928_rubenvb.tar.bz2 is actually a *.tar.gz file:
> please rename it because automated scripts won't work with it.
>
> --
> O.S.
>
Woops, you are correct, will rename =s
Ruben
---
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> HI guys,
>
> I have managed to get another build out. This time I left out
> (cloog-)ppl, and thus the Graphite optimizations. These things just
> kept bugging me, hard. I used GCC 4.6 from 20100918 (the 20100925 had
> a bug in lto which ma
HI guys,
I have managed to get another build out. This time I left out
(cloog-)ppl, and thus the Graphite optimizations. These things just
kept bugging me, hard. I used GCC 4.6 from 20100918 (the 20100925 had
a bug in lto which made this feature unusable, as lto1.exe crashed
each time it was used)
JonY writes:
> OK, link to GNU SASL added.
Thanks!
Oh, and my continued testing shows that both the x86 and x64 compilers
work well for me. Thank you all for your great work in putting this
together!
/Simon
--
Start
