Hello All -
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
>>>
>>> Brand new idea: I define
>>> #define _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS 1
>>>
>>> This adds thread to std:: and allows me to see what undefined stuff there
>>> is! Perfect, no? I'll keep you guys informed.
>>>
2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
>>
>> Brand new idea: I define
>> #define _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS 1
>>
>> This adds thread to std:: and allows me to see what undefined stuff there
>> is! Perfect, no? I'll keep you guys informed.
>>
>> Ruben
>
> Sorry for the SPAM...
>
> Some additional thoughts:
>
> 1. M
>
>
> Brand new idea: I define
> #define _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS 1
>
This adds thread to std:: and allows me to see what undefined stuff there
> is! Perfect, no? I'll keep you guys informed.
>
> Ruben
>
Sorry for the SPAM...
Some additional thoughts:
1. Mingw-w64 compilers define:
GCC_GTHR_WIN32_H
2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem
> 2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem
>
>> 2010/8/25 Kai Tietz
>>
>> 2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
>>> >> Yes, I would prefer here a native win32 API variant for threads, as
>>> >> the dependency to pthread for c++ isn't in all cases the best
>>> >> solution. Also it seems to me t
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hello All -
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>> On 8/25/2010 5:29 AM, Earnie wrote:
>>> John E. / TDM wrote:
* Every C++ program would require the pthreads-w32 DLL to be
distributed with it.
>>> ...
>>> Why n
2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem
> 2010/8/25 Kai Tietz
>
> 2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
>> >> Yes, I would prefer here a native win32 API variant for threads, as
>> >> the dependency to pthread for c++ isn't in all cases the best
>> >> solution. Also it seems to me that the abilities of c++0x are limite
Hello All -
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 8/25/2010 5:29 AM, Earnie wrote:
>> John E. / TDM wrote:
>>> * Every C++ program would require the pthreads-w32 DLL to be
>>> distributed with it.
>> ...
>> Why not code pthreads to use Windows gthreads? It would get wider
2010/8/25 Kai Tietz
> 2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
> >> Yes, I would prefer here a native win32 API variant for threads, as
> >> the dependency to pthread for c++ isn't in all cases the best
> >> solution. Also it seems to me that the abilities of c++0x are limited
> >> and so a native win32 imple
2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
>> Yes, I would prefer here a native win32 API variant for threads, as
>> the dependency to pthread for c++ isn't in all cases the best
>> solution. Also it seems to me that the abilities of c++0x are limited
>> and so a native win32 implementation should work.
>
> That'
>
> Yes, I would prefer here a native win32 API variant for threads, as
> the dependency to pthread for c++ isn't in all cases the best
> solution. Also it seems to me that the abilities of c++0x are limited
> and so a native win32 implementation should work.
That's good news!
> We have patche
2010/8/25 John E. / TDM :
> On 8/25/2010 5:59 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> There is no such thing as 'the LGPL', and it matters which version.
>> Version 2.1 (which seems the relevant version) requires you to
>> distribute source code in its clause 4, and so does LGPL-3.
>>
>> But note that sim
On 8/25/2010 5:59 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> There is no such thing as 'the LGPL', and it matters which version.
> Version 2.1 (which seems the relevant version) requires you to
> distribute source code in its clause 4, and so does LGPL-3.
>
> But note that similar requirements (from GPL-3) a
On 8/25/2010 5:29 AM, Earnie wrote:
> John E. / TDM wrote:
>> * Every C++ program would require the pthreads-w32 DLL to be
>> distributed with it.
>
> You mean every thread enabled program would need to distribute it,
> correct? Wouldn't libstdc++ be coded to be conditionally dependent on
>
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Earnie wrote:
> John E. / TDM wrote:
>> On 8/24/2010 3:24 PM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> I think there needs to be some code written to link win32-pthreads
>>> to the gcc std::thread API, just like OpenMP also uses
>>> win32-pthreads. Is this line of thought correct?
>>
>> T
John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 8/24/2010 3:24 PM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > I think there needs to be some code written to link win32-pthreads
> > to the gcc std::thread API, just like OpenMP also uses
> > win32-pthreads. Is this line of thought correct?
>
> This is correct -- and also extremely inco
2010/8/25 Ruben Van Boxem :
> I guess this mailing list is as good a place as any to start this
> discussion.
>
> Eventually it will boil down to someone writing the hard code (as I am not
> near capable enough). I can, though, get some info and gather docs for a
> willing party.
>
> The thing is:
I guess this mailing list is as good a place as any to start this
discussion.
Eventually it will boil down to someone writing the hard code (as I am not
near capable enough). I can, though, get some info and gather docs for a
willing party.
The thing is: GCC 4.4+ has provided std::thread for POSI
17 matches
Mail list logo
