On 5 August 2010 16:53, Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> wrote:
>>
>> There are three roots of packages:
>>
>> 1) Sezero's custom toolchain
>> 2) Automatic snapshot toolchain
>> 3) Rolling release 1.0 branch and trunk of w64
>>
>> 1) recent binutils, head mi
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
>
> There are three roots of packages:
>
> 1) Sezero's custom toolchain
> 2) Automatic snapshot toolchain
> 3) Rolling release 1.0 branch and trunk of w64
>
> 1) recent binutils, head mingw-w64, gcc-4.4 + loads of patches = very
> stable, upd
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ehsan Azarnasab
Date: Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Change from 4.4.4 to 4.6.0
To: Sisyphus
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Sisyphus wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ozkan Sezer"
>
>>> you're supposed
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 8/04/10 9:10 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> What happens if you comment out lines 459 and 462 in
>> win32/osdep.h and allow stdlib.h and mbstring.h to be
>> included and get a proper definition of MB_CUR_MAX ?
>> I don't know why it doesn't w
