Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-08-04 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 8/04/10 9:10 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > What happens if you comment out lines 459 and 462 in > win32/osdep.h and allow stdlib.h and mbstring.h to be > included and get a proper definition of MB_CUR_MAX ? > I don't know why it doesn't want to include those headers > but I just cross-compiled zip3

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-08-04 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >  Hi Kai, > > On 7/31/10 1:13 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2010/7/31 Chris Sutcliffe: >>> It turns out it's not gcc, it's due to the fact that libmsvcrt.a doesn't >>> export `__p___mb_cur_max'.  The mingw.org msvcrt.def file contains: >>> >>> __p_

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-08-04 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hi Kai, On 7/31/10 1:13 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2010/7/31 Chris Sutcliffe: >> It turns out it's not gcc, it's due to the fact that libmsvcrt.a doesn't >> export `__p___mb_cur_max'. The mingw.org msvcrt.def file contains: >> >> __p___mb_cur_max >> >> where as the mingw-w64-crt does not. Would it

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Is v1.0 recommended for 'production' usage?

2010-08-04 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Luis Lavena writes: > Hello, > > I work with Ruby language, more specifically improving it's Windows > support using open source solutions like GCC instead of Visual Studio. > > This project is called RubyInstaller, and a side effect of it is > increase awareness and support of developers working

[Mingw-w64-public] Is v1.0 recommended for 'production' usage?

2010-08-04 Thread Luis Lavena
Hello, I work with Ruby language, more specifically improving it's Windows support using open source solutions like GCC instead of Visual Studio. This project is called RubyInstaller, and a side effect of it is increase awareness and support of developers working with OSX/Linux to provide native