Anyway, I guess it is not so important for clean checkouts...
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Even if it is exact the same, the timestamp is older the the source
> files, so build tries to rebuild it.
>
> Thanks,
> Alon.
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Kai T
Hello,
Even if it is exact the same, the timestamp is older the the source
files, so build tries to rebuild it.
Thanks,
Alon.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>
> Hello Alon,
>
> 2009/12/24 Alon Bar-Lev :
> > I don't understand why you keep generated files in svn...
> > But you
Hello Alon,
2009/12/24 Alon Bar-Lev :
> I don't understand why you keep generated files in svn...
> But you should also checkin an updated version of aclocal.m4.
Well, this is a decision we made, that we want to provide the use of
configure without the need of having proper autotools installed. So
2009/12/24 Chris Sutcliffe :
> I will create a simple test case over the holidays for this and send it to
> you.
Thanks
> Excellent, I will work on packaging GDB 7.0.1 for mingw-w32 initially.
> Is there going to be an updated 1222(/23) build of mingw-w32 for
> mingw or cygwin? Once I have a w
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Grant Pedersen wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ozkan Sezer [mailto:seze...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 25 December 2009 15:13
>> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Custom toolchain build with gcc-4.4.3
>> (2009-12-24)
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ozkan Sezer [mailto:seze...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 25 December 2009 15:13
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Custom toolchain build with gcc-4.4.3
> (2009-12-24)
>
> To anyone who might be interested: I updated my custom
> w3
