On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:02 AM, kmx wrote:
>
> - trunk revs. 1644 and 1645 updating kernel32.def and ntdll.def
> for x86: needed/planned for 1.0 branch, too? Same for r1581 of
> crypt32.def.
..
>>>
>>> Back-merge of at least the fixing parts would be nice (don't know
>
- trunk revs. 1644 and 1645 updating kernel32.def and ntdll.def
for x86: needed/planned for 1.0 branch, too? Same for r1581 of
crypt32.def.
>>>
>>> ..
>>
>> Back-merge of at least the fixing parts would be nice (don't know
>> which ones they are..)
>
> Well, we could, but I am
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2009/12/24 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hello Ozkan,
>>>
>>> nice to hear you are back. Yes, there were some changes on svn. Some
>>> are back-merged, because they were triggered by bug reports of wrong
2009/12/24 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello Ozkan,
>>
>> nice to hear you are back. Yes, there were some changes on svn. Some
>> are back-merged, because they were triggered by bug reports of wrong
>> behavior.
>>
>> 2009/12/24 Ozkan Sezer :
>>> Hi all: I
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Ozkan,
>
> nice to hear you are back. Yes, there were some changes on svn. Some
> are back-merged, because they were triggered by bug reports of wrong
> behavior.
>
> 2009/12/24 Ozkan Sezer :
>> Hi all: I've been away for a while due to pe
Hello Ozkan,
nice to hear you are back. Yes, there were some changes on svn. Some
are back-merged, because they were triggered by bug reports of wrong
behavior.
2009/12/24 Ozkan Sezer :
> Hi all: I've been away for a while due to personal issues
> and it seems like there have been several change
Hi all: I've been away for a while due to personal issues
and it seems like there have been several changes in the svn.
While I'm trying to make a new personal 4.4.3-based toolchain
build, I'm trying to catch up and understand those changes:
- trunk, rev. 1590: Remove override of _lseeki64.
What
Hi Kai,
>>> Ah, as you describe this, I am remembering, that there is a patch for
>>> C++ FE pending (it is a bug), that the namespace should be able to
>>> contain the dllexport/dllimport here.
>>
>> Fair enough, hopefully the patch will make it in to mainline gcc/g++.
>
> Yes, if you could prepa
I don't understand why you keep generated files in svn...
But you should also checkin an updated version of aclocal.m4.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2009/12/24 Alon Bar-Lev :
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Ok, I see. I added to the comment that t
2009/12/24 Alon Bar-Lev :
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Ok, I see. I added to the comment that this just happens on
>> cross-compile. Btw gendef should work as native build on linux, too.
>> There shouldn't be any dependencies to Windows specific runtime.
>
> Almost true..
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Ok, I see. I added to the comment that this just happens on
>> cross-compile. Btw gendef should work as native build on linux, too.
>> There shouldn't be any dependencies to Windows specifi
11 matches
Mail list logo
