Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Sources for compiler?

2008-06-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
NightStrike wrote: > > Thats some damn good progress. Thanks. > > Thank Kai, not me. I just talk a lot -- he does all the work :) Thanks Kai! Excellent work. Cheers, Erik -- - Erik de Castro Lopo ---

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-06-03 Thread NightStrike
On 6/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In reply to various mails, let me add some comments: > > > > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use > > > .exe > > > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that > > > you

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include

2008-06-03 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Matthew Bentham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . . > Maybe the access() problem doesn't even exist in SP1. Oh, shit ... I think that's right !! Before installing SP1, with a certain MinGW32 installation, I got: --- C:\_64\C>\strawberry\c\bin\gcc -o t

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w 64

2008-06-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, In reply to various mails, let me add some comments: > > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use > > .exe > > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that > > you currently need to "Configure mingw64 no-asm no-hw". Note that OpenS

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-06-03 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi Stefan, >Hi, > > I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple > of changes to the source code (see attached patch). > > Some notes: > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include

2008-06-03 Thread Matthew Bentham
- Original Message > From: NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Matthew Bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 8:06:13 AM > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include > > On 5/23/08, Matthew Bentham wrote: > > My exper

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-06-03 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi Stefan, FX, > > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use > > .exe > > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that > > you currently need to "Configure mingw64 no-asm no-hw". > > IIUC, the current position on naming is that mingw64 should

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-06-03 Thread FX
> - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use > .exe > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that > you currently need to "Configure mingw64 no-asm no-hw". IIUC, the current position on naming is that mingw64 shouldn't be used, but rather th

[Mingw-w64-public] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-06-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple of changes to the source code (see attached patch). Some notes: - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use .exe extension for c

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include

2008-06-03 Thread NightStrike
On 5/23/08, Matthew Bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My experience with the binary builds from mingw64 SourceForge has also been > that they suffer from the Vista access() problem, as we discussed on this > mailing list on Feb 24th 2008. I've included my notes from the time > (discussing th

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include

2008-06-03 Thread NightStrike
On 6/2/08, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "NightStrike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Cannot #include > . > . > > I'm running with SP1 > > installe