For what it's worth, I did raise this as a potential issue with the apache2
license migration for Khronos projects, and explicitly asked about MIT
dual-licensing at least for the GL headers. (The morbidly curious with a
Khronos membership may find the relevant discussion in the arb-nextgen
archives
Ok, so the gist I'm getting is that it's impossible to use Vulkan
without using the official headers and loaders? It's just that I can't
see the Apache 2.0 license anywhere in the specification (single-page
html or pdf), so if I could re-implement those I would.
What do you mean "re-implementing parts of the Vulkan APIs"?
I have a feeling someone is confused about licensing
Also, I'm NOT a lawyer. What follows does not constitute legal advice and
anyone who's actually concerned about the legal implications should consult
an actual lawyer who is famil
