For what it's worth, I did raise this as a potential issue with the apache2
license migration for Khronos projects, and explicitly asked about MIT
dual-licensing at least for the GL headers. (The morbidly curious with a
Khronos membership may find the relevant discussion in the arb-nextgen
archives
Ok, so the gist I'm getting is that it's impossible to use Vulkan
without using the official headers and loaders? It's just that I can't
see the Apache 2.0 license anywhere in the specification (single-page
html or pdf), so if I could re-implement those I would.
What do you mean "re-implementing parts of the Vulkan APIs"?
I have a feeling someone is confused about licensing
Also, I'm NOT a lawyer. What follows does not constitute legal advice and
anyone who's actually concerned about the legal implications should consult
an actual lawyer who is famil
Hi all,
For context, I'm interested in re-implementing parts of the Vulkan APIs
(at least the parts necessary to develop a Wayland compositor), as the
OpenBSD project won't accept Apache License 2.0 for code except when it
is deemed unavoidable (LLVM), and the Khronos' APIs use this license.
The
