Re: [Mesa-dev] scons tnl bug, rfc on removing mesa rtasm.

2012-01-23 Thread Alexander von Gluck
On 23.01.2012 14:44, Jose Fonseca wrote: I don't think that one should introduce a dependency between Mesa and Gallium as each should be built without the other. The right way to do this is to move rtasm to side by side w/ MEsa & gallium (e.g., src/rtasm), and have Mesa and Gallium both depen

Re: [Mesa-dev] scons tnl bug, rfc on removing mesa rtasm.

2012-01-23 Thread Jose Fonseca
I don't think that one should introduce a dependency between Mesa and Gallium as each should be built without the other. The right way to do this is to move rtasm to side by side w/ MEsa & gallium (e.g., src/rtasm), and have Mesa and Gallium both depend on it as needed. Another way is to rename

[Mesa-dev] scons tnl bug, rfc on removing mesa rtasm.

2012-01-23 Thread Alexander von Gluck
So I've been digging through the assertion error I am getting under Haiku and have finally found the issue... The Mesa tnl depends on the Mesa rtasm header (mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.h), however scons never compiles mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c into libmesa. As x86/rtasm/x86sse.c is never compiled in,