On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 10.02.2011 13:25, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> On 10 February 2011 09:47, José Fonseca > Wouldn't it be
>> easier/cleaner if sRGB sampling/rendering support was not
>>> done through formats, but through enable/disable bits in
>>> pipe_sa
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 02:06 -0800, Christoph Bumiller wrote:
> On 10.02.2011 09:47, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:55 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >>> In this case, we always use the corresponding linear format in
> >>> cr
Am 10.02.2011 13:25, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 10 February 2011 09:47, José Fonseca > Wouldn't it be
> easier/cleaner if sRGB sampling/rendering support was not
>> done through formats, but through enable/disable bits in
>> pipe_sampler_view/pipe_rt_blend_state?
>>
> The issue with that is that s
On 10 February 2011 09:47, José Fonseca > Wouldn't it be
easier/cleaner if sRGB sampling/rendering support was not
> done through formats, but through enable/disable bits in
> pipe_sampler_view/pipe_rt_blend_state?
>
The issue with that is that sRGB only really makes sense for the 8-bit
RGBA format
On 10.02.2011 09:47, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:55 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> In this case, we always use the corresponding linear format in
>>> create_surface,
>>> therefore we should check for linear format support a
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:47 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:55 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > In this case, we always use the corresponding linear format in
>> > create_surface,
>> > therefore we should check for linear
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:55 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > In this case, we always use the corresponding linear format in
> > create_surface,
> > therefore we should check for linear format support as well.
>
> Seems sane to me.
>
> Dave.