-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/2011 07:54 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the standard C bool type, given it's a) standard, b)
> shorter. Furthermore Microsoft's windows.h already defines boolean:
I'm with Jose on this one.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
We've been (gradually) switching to (bool/true/false) in the
Intel driver code. I definitely prefer that.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the standard C bool type, given it's a) standard, b)
> shorter. Furthermore Microsoft's windows.h already defines boolean:
>
> $ grep -r '\' /usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/
> /usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/rpcndr.h:typede
Boolean is also more prone to bugs. I've got this habit from C++, I
usually convert int to bool by a simple assignment (without the "!= 0"
part). That doesn't work with boolean defined as char, because the
upper bits are always truncated.
Marek
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 08:54 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I prefer the standard C bool type, given it's a) standard, b)
>> shorter. Furthermore Microsoft's windows.h already defines boolean:
>>
>> $ grep -r '\' /usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include
On 06/08/2011 08:54 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Personally, I prefer the standard C bool type, given it's a) standard, b)
shorter. Furthermore Microsoft's windows.h already defines boolean:
$ grep -r '\' /usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/
/usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/rpcndr.h:typedef unsigned ch
Personally, I prefer the standard C bool type, given it's a) standard, b)
shorter. Furthermore Microsoft's windows.h already defines boolean:
$ grep -r '\' /usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/
/usr/i586-mingw32msvc/include/rpcndr.h:typedef unsigned char boolean;
which can create havoc depending on
