Cc: mesa-maintainers, who might be interested in this discussion :)
On Tuesday, 2017-11-07 16:33:57 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Jason let me know today that non-shared glapi is broken in meson. The tests
> for
> non-shared glapi are broken in autotools and meson. Is anyone still using
> non-share
Jason let me know today that non-shared glapi is broken in meson. The tests for
non-shared glapi are broken in autotools and meson. Is anyone still using
non-shared glapi, or can we delete it?
signature.asc
Description: signature
___
mesa-dev mailing li
On 3 August 2016 at 16:37, Chad Versace wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 06:40 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>> is there still a real need for having non-shared glapi ?
>> Otherwise, should we remove it ?
>
>
> +1
> I have the same question.
>
Think static libOSMesa and x
On 04.08.2016 11:21, Marek Olšák wrote:
> src/glx isn't gallium. src/glx isn't even used on Windows. That linked
> file is completely disconnected from everything this thread is about.
ups, I mixed up several threads ... I meant the shared glapi library.
(see the other thread "non-shared glapi st
On 08/02/2016 06:40 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
Hi folks,
is there still a real need for having non-shared glapi ?
Otherwise, should we remove it ?
+1
I have the same question.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.or
Hi folks,
is there still a real need for having non-shared glapi ?
Otherwise, should we remove it ?
--mtx
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
