On 25.08.2011 23:15, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 05:06:05 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
>> What ? No.
>> It would be:
>> SAMPLE DST[0], SRC[0], RES[ADDR[0] - 4], SAMP[ADDR[0] - 4],
>> OpenGL does not decouple resources and samplers at GLSL level.
> Exactly, meaning that a group
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 05:06:05 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
> What ? No.
> It would be:
> SAMPLE DST[0], SRC[0], RES[ADDR[0] - 4], SAMP[ADDR[0] - 4],
> OpenGL does not decouple resources and samplers at GLSL level.
Exactly, meaning that a group of samplers will have exactly the same resourc
On 25.08.2011 22:46, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:42:21 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
>> Of course -4 isn't a valid resource, I just meant to emphasize that I
>> cannot tell at all the resource to be accessed.
>> ADDR[0].x - 4 should of course be >= 0 and valid.
>>
>> And, may
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:42:21 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
> Of course -4 isn't a valid resource, I just meant to emphasize that I
> cannot tell at all the resource to be accessed.
> ADDR[0].x - 4 should of course be >= 0 and valid.
>
> And, maybe it seems silly to you, but OpenGL allows i
On 25.08.2011 22:42, Christoph Bumiller wrote:
> On 25.08.2011 22:40, Zack Rusin wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:30:26 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
>>> Putting the resource type in the resource declaration instead of the
>>> instruction isn't necessarily smart considering indirect resourc
On 25.08.2011 22:40, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:30:26 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
>> Putting the resource type in the resource declaration instead of the
>> instruction isn't necessarily smart considering indirect resource access
>> ... I just hope the person implementing
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 04:30:26 PM Christoph Bumiller wrote:
> Putting the resource type in the resource declaration instead of the
> instruction isn't necessarily smart considering indirect resource access
> ... I just hope the person implementing it remembers to provide a base
> array addre
On 25.08.2011 06:42, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:14:48 PM Bryan Cain wrote:
>> Like Dave said, the GLSL->TGSI translator needs to account for this.
> Probably not, at least yet. All of those instructions are DX10.1 level
> instructions which support splitting of samplers a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:14:48 PM Bryan Cain wrote:
>> Like Dave said, the GLSL->TGSI translator needs to account for this.
>
> Probably not, at least yet. All of those instructions are DX10.1 level
> instructions which support splitting
On 08/24/2011 11:42 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:14:48 PM Bryan Cain wrote:
>> Like Dave said, the GLSL->TGSI translator needs to account for this.
> Probably not, at least yet. All of those instructions are DX10.1 level
> instructions which support splitting of sampler
On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:14:48 PM Bryan Cain wrote:
> Like Dave said, the GLSL->TGSI translator needs to account for this.
Probably not, at least yet. All of those instructions are DX10.1 level
instructions which support splitting of samplers and the underlaying resource,
we don't suppor
On 08/24/2011 07:26 AM, Michal Krol wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Any reasons
>>
>>{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD",TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD },
>>{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD_MS", TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD_MS },
>>{ 1, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE", TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE },
>>{ 1, 4, 0, 0,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michal Krol wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Any reasons
>>
>> { 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD", TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD },
>> { 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD_MS", TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD_MS },
>> { 1, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE", TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE },
>> { 1
- Original Message -
> Any reasons
>
>{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD",TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD },
>{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD_MS", TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD_MS },
>{ 1, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE", TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE },
>{ 1, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE_B",TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE_B },
>
Any reasons
{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD",TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD },
{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, "LOAD_MS", TGSI_OPCODE_LOAD_MS },
{ 1, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE", TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE },
{ 1, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE_B",TGSI_OPCODE_SAMPLE_B },
{ 1, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, "SAMPLE_C",TGSI_OP
15 matches
Mail list logo