On 24 October 2011 14:16, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I did do some testing by making libdrm claim a smaller aperture size
> and thus trigger the rollback code, which caught one bug. Generally,
> piglit doesn't trigger rollback at all, which is a bit concerning from
> a testing coverage standpoint.
>
>
I did do some testing by making libdrm claim a smaller aperture size
and thus trigger the rollback code, which caught one bug. Generally,
piglit doesn't trigger rollback at all, which is a bit concerning from
a testing coverage standpoint.
For people reviewing, I think the interesting part to rev