On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:43:49 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> While investigating an etracer issue on Ivybridge, I did a lot of careful
> reading of the tracked state atoms' dirty bits. Found a bunch of issues.
> Unfortunately, none of these patches fixed the issues I was seeing.
>
> While we're
While investigating an etracer issue on Ivybridge, I did a lot of careful
reading of the tracked state atoms' dirty bits. Found a bunch of issues.
Unfortunately, none of these patches fixed the issues I was seeing.
While we're at it: BRW_NEW_CONTEXT seems like the wrong thing in basically
every c
