On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>
>
> On 21/08/17 08:58, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Timothy Arceri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/08/17 03:25, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
>
>
On 21/08/17 08:58, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 21/08/17 03:25, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
Shared (the default) and packed layouts are decided by the
implementation.
Currently we just pack the
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On 21/08/17 03:25, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Timothy Arceri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Shared (the default) and packed layouts are decided by the
>>> implementation.
>>> Currently we just pack them using the std140 l
On 21/08/17 03:25, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Shared (the default) and packed layouts are decided by the implementation.
Currently we just pack them using the std140 layout. This change makes it so
we use the slightly more compact std430 layout on
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Shared (the default) and packed layouts are decided by the implementation.
> Currently we just pack them using the std140 layout. This change makes it so
> we use the slightly more compact std430 layout on i965 and radeonsi.
>
> I doubt this
Shared (the default) and packed layouts are decided by the implementation.
Currently we just pack them using the std140 layout. This change makes it so
we use the slightly more compact std430 layout on i965 and radeonsi.
I doubt this will help many games, but it still seems worth implementing.
I c
