On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:04 AM Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On 2020-04-06 6:34 p.m., Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > The ideal thing would be to be able to click any jobs that we want to
> > run, say "arm64_a630_gles31", and for gitlab to realize that it needs
> > to automatically trigger dependencies of th
On 2020-04-06 6:34 p.m., Rob Clark wrote:
>
> The ideal thing would be to be able to click any jobs that we want to
> run, say "arm64_a630_gles31", and for gitlab to realize that it needs
> to automatically trigger dependencies of that job (meson-arm64, and
> arm_build+arm_test). But not sure if t
On Friday 2020-02-28 08:59, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>I believe that in January, we had $2082 of network cost (almost
>entirely egress; ingress is basically free) and $1750 of
>cloud-storage cost (almost all of which was download). That's based
>on 16TB of cloud-storage (CI artifacts, container image
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:00 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 23:45, Matt Turner wrote:
> > We're paying 75K USD for the bandwidth to transfer data from the
> > GitLab cloud instance. i.e., for viewing the https site, for
> > cloning/updating git repos, and for down
Hi Jan,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 10:09, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2020-02-28 08:59, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >I believe that in January, we had $2082 of network cost (almost
> >entirely egress; ingress is basically free) and $1750 of
> >cloud-storage cost (almost all of which was download). Th
Hi Matt,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 23:45, Matt Turner wrote:
> We're paying 75K USD for the bandwidth to transfer data from the
> GitLab cloud instance. i.e., for viewing the https site, for
> cloning/updating git repos, and for downloading CI artifacts/images to
> the testing machines (AFAIU).
I b
On 02/27/2020 05:00 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 02/27/2020 01:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes
>> already, here's the long version.
>>
>> The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our
>> communities, an
On 02/27/2020 01:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes
> already, here's the long version.
>
> The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our
> communities, and is used extensively. This especially includes all
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:27:04 +0100 Daniel Vetter said:
Might I suggest that given the kind of expenses detailed here, literally buying
1 - 4 reasonably specced boxes and hosting them at OSUOSL would be incredibly
cheaper? (we (enlightenment.org) have been doing so for years on a single
box). We f
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:27:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes
> already, here's the long version.
>
> The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our
> communities, and is used extensively. This espec
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:27 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes
> already, here's the long version.
>
> The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our
> communities, and is used extensively. This especially inc
Hi all,
You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes
already, here's the long version.
The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our
communities, and is used extensively. This especially includes all the
CI integration. Modern development process and tooling
12 matches
Mail list logo
